Recent content by KERZHAKOV

Of course Russia. :)

Russia (I live here :)) China (because it's first civilization I played (cvi2)) Rome, Greece, Egypt, Persia, Babylon (great Antique civs) Germany, France, England...

I don't think that it is good if cities will grow on 2 or more tiles. For me there is not interesting and I do not see in it special sense. Cities on 1 tile it is distinctive feature Civilization to other strategy-games.

Yes! It is a magnificent new opportunity in CivIV! Barbarians in CivIV become more similar to the true opponents than in Conquests. will not be so easily and not interesting against them to struggle. Though I would prefer to see in game of more civilizations than hordes of barbarians. I agree...

I think that developers should make all civilizations equal in CivIV. But at each civilization I would like to see some preferable qualities which would be the best in relation to other civilizations. But thus there would be no several civilizations surpassing the others on " the general force...

I completely agree! :thumbsup: Cossacks - the most balanced horse armies of the late Middle Ages and the beginning of an industrial era. When I play Russia Cossacks make a basis of my attacking and defensive armies. :smug:

It's my desires: 1. Russia(USSR?) 2. England 3. France 4. Germany(Prussia?) 5. Rome/Italy 6. Scandinavia/Sweden(Finland?Danmark?Norwey?) 7. Egypt 8. China 9. India(Tibet?) 10. America/USA(Iroquois?) 11. Japan 12. Greece 13. Arabia(Israel?) 14. Mongolia(Korea?)...

I think that to construct a colossus or the great library it much better than to construct pyramids. Pyramids needed to be made more effective. This my opinion :)

I do not think, that it so important to have good reputation. In the game who is stronger, that and wins. If you want to have many resources and luxury, simply win them.:) It is simple enough. :smug:

Good work! It's very realistic. :) But...I don't think that russian forces hase this anytime... :undecide:

That's GREAT! :thumbsup: Very realistic animation! :)

I think, that the control of the greatest territory over any case brings (or will bring) profit. Therefore I always try to grasp and keep city. To destroy cities silly because means for the basis of new city will be necessary still. Units as are faster treated in cities, and cities serve as item...

It is not so similar, but if you have rich imagination to play it is possible!;) it is serious, quite good work...It would be desirable to see the Vladimir Putin's person ... :D

My position in diplomatic relations with al should not break contracts. It makes good reputation and brings benefit in diplomacy. I threat only to those nations which it is polite to me (they frequently agree). Sorry, my english so bad... ;)

I think that 10 cities quite will suffice :mischief: But...the economy at all will not satisfy... :D Seriously, I think that on an average map of 15 cities will allow to leave in leaders :p