to keep or destroy?

Keep or raze?

  • Conquer and keep

    Votes: 62 79.5%
  • Raze and replace

    Votes: 16 20.5%

  • Total voters
    78
I think, that the control of the greatest territory over any case brings (or will bring) profit. Therefore I always try to grasp and keep city. To destroy cities silly because means for the basis of new city will be necessary still. Units as are faster treated in cities, and cities serve as item of their gathering. :)
 
I'm now wondering two things:

Does the AI get hated by other AI if it razes?

When you capture a size 1 city in C3C it automatically gets razed, no choice about it, does this hit the AI attitude?
 
Why raze? You can use the population to rush lot's off stuff. I always rush a temple or library, barracks, coastal fortress. In that way I remove much of the problem with sad enemy citizens as well.
 
Why not keep them its great to expand your civ and you can use it to build troops clocer to enamy lines...

:nuke: ...unless you just nuked that city :nuke:

P.S. anyoune that captures tose citys... :goodjob:
 
Back
Top Bottom