What drives you to keep playing Civ III and posting here Zouave? I don't think I would have the time and energy to do all you do with that stick so far up my ***. :crazyeye: :crazyeye: :crazyeye:
The game is already plenty frustrating and micromanaged as it is. I don't know about you but I didn't pay 50 bucks to watch the computer play my civ for an hour while I stare at the screen, watching it move every single unit without forifying :lol: :lol: :lol: You must be joking :goodjob:
I definitely think that trade embargos should be according to resources and not trade in general. Like you could sign an oil embargo against a nation while still trading luxuries if it suited both countries. But at what point would the oil embargo hinder the normal trade relations and possible...
I see scenario builder as being something in a patch. If there is an expansion pack it is probably to update to Multiplayer along with Pro-scenarios (Civ 3 Gold?)
They put games into genres for reasons. I can't think of a strategy game to date that I have played that I couldn't beat without investing a ton of time and energy into. That's just what it takes to play a strategy game. The reason you don't like it is prolly because you aren't a strategy...
I don't know that I would like that. That would take away from the Turn-based strategy and add to the Real-time strategy. While I agree Total War is a really cool game (which is in my computer drive at the moment) I don't think it's battle system would work in Civ.
It would be cool to see...
I didn't know about 1.17 until like two days before they released it...when they released the ReadMe. That might be wrong though...can't remember :confused:
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.