If portugal and babylon are not in the new frontier pass, they would fit nicely in coupled dlc packs with Portugal and morocco, assyria and babylon, and other couples could be two native north american tribes, and maybe a two leader italy (?) (a man can still dream).
Interesting, perhaps they are going with queen Margherita of savoy, i hope the capital would be Turin at this point instead of Rome. And i hope the italian abilities are connected to the renaissance instead of the risorgimento.
these are the countries the EU is opening it's borders to in a couple of days, what is he saying by that? next pack is the european one after ethiopia?
Well because looking at the rise and fall roster if civs there isn't one that i believe is on the first spot for getting a second leader.
I mean in rise and fall we had: Cree, Netherlands, Mongolia, Georgia, Scotland, Mapuche, Zulu and Korea.
None of them and i repeat none of them for me need a...
I still think that the alternate leader needs R&F mechanics instead of a R&F civilization.
I mean of all the civs that need an alternate leader we go with the Netherlands? Korea?
Only kublai khan for me has an opportunity being leader of both china and mongolia since China needs an alternate...
I really don't understand how everyone thinks that legions and baths represent italy from the middle ages onwards, and yet accepts the byzantines which was still the Roman empire but later on.
History has contiguity and societies change gradually through time so honestly every civilization that...
Every single game i've played with new frontier had the AI recruiting partisans in my cities. I had to cover my empire with spies to avoid having more. But it happened every single game, apocalypse mode or normal mode.
Vatican was a fortified borough of Rome since the italian unification, then it became a separate country but it's still Rome.
Mexico city was built on top of Tenochtitlan, but it's not like tenochtitlan disappeared and then the spanish came in and saw some fancy ruins on top of which they...
because these features were meant to be filler, so of course they are in regions without civs, but that doesn't mean anything, the coincidence we see is a convergence of firaxis' policy of territorial representation used to choose the civs to put in the various expansions and the company's...
honestly i find it quite hard to see a relationship between possible new civs and the filler natural features in this map, the maya location, the gran colombian and ethiopian one i believe are purely a coincidence.
I believe that now Africa the only civ that is missing to be decently represented is Morocco.
with morocco it would feel complete to me.
swahili and benin could be other options but they can be very well represented also by city states.
I honestly prefer Siam over Vietnam.
Siam and Ethiopia are the uncolonized duo. Should be staple for just that.
And also thai kingdoms were more of a player in south east asia than Vietnam, since the vietnamese were pretty much always under the chinese influence or control.
I know Siam and...
I honestly, as an italian, would be very annoyed if they represented italy in civ with a Pope, and i think in italy there would be a lot of friction for something like that. So we won't have a pope leading a civ. At least i don't think they would want to risk it.
Papal influence in italy has...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.