Recent content by Sascha77

Hmm... not really livestream, but my bad I guess... :)

Doesn't seem to have been posted already, and since part one was uploaded only 5 hours ago, here's a link: S.

I googled Chanakya and the first pic that shows up on the results-page (from a movie/TV-show I guess?) makes him look like Jayavarman's long lost twin.. :D S.

I still like both games. However: 1UPT - most of the time, anyway Graphics and audio are nicer - but no Spock .. :( Religious game is more fun in V - IV's religions are a bit too generic for my taste new features like natural wonders and ranged combat OTOH, V usually lacks truly...

So... it's England led by Elton John then...? :p

I don't see why they shouldn't be able to adapt the "Merchant of Venice"-mechanic for Civ VI. Either that or a different unique ability to take over city-states as you could in V. E.

Ottomans would be nice, I just hope they'd get more interesting traits/units than in V. Speaking of large, multi-ethnic empires: What about Austria-Hungary? Inca or Maya should pretty much be a given, considering how few American Civs are in the game. In fact, I would argue for both of them to...

S.

I seriously doubt they'd "give away" all new leaders in the teaser-video - that would kinda defeat the purpose of them stretching out the introduction of new leaders/features. Besides: The Statue of Liberty and the Berlin Wall feature pretty prominently in the video... so shouldn't we be...

I agree. Nothing against the great nation of Canuck-istan, but - just like Australia - it seems more fitting as a DLC-Civ.

So? With languages/cultures this old, compromise is pretty much unavoidable in some cases. Heck, we can't even be sure the Latin spoken by Augustus or Trajan in V and VI is how a citizen of ancient Rome would've sounded like. If you can't properly represent a dead language in its spoken form...

Please don't let it be for the obvious Civ ... *cough* Rome ... Quite frankly, seeing how biased towards Europe and Asia the current lineup is, I could really do without any more Civs from either region. Well... except for the Celts perhaps, whom I adored in V. As for the alternative leader...

Edited title. Please no "click-bait" titles Unless I've overlooked someone, overall we have: Japan Indonesia Korea China The Mongols Khmer The Scythians India and I suppose you could also count Australia and large chunks of Russia? While I'm at it: Europe: 10 Civs, 11 leaders - 11/12 if...

Interesting ... that's pretty much how we pronounce his name/title in German (it's spelled "Dschingis" over here). Question is: How much difference is there between modern Mongolian and whatever the people in Genghis' time spoke? S.

In keeping with the spirit of one of my earlier posts re. the upcoming R&F-leaders: Ohhhh, yes! I just hope he'll be as unhinged as his "I'm going to kick your ass"-animation from the first look video seems to suggest. Haven't read the entire thread, so sorry if I'm kinda beating a dead...