Speak for yourself. I find it hilarious how leftist Americans eagerly accept the fact that they are stupid. Self proclaimed Hollywood elitists like Bill Maher continuosly ridicule the lowly American masses of being stupid, and his leftard audience stands up and clap with earnist agreement not...
Something like what Obama is doing here?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meEW8z_f514
I laughed when I watched the fear mongering in the Obama ad. How can anyone really take that ad seriously?
You could almost think it was a joke right?
@aneeshm
Very insightful post, and an interesting argument. I find myself agreeing with you. There is certainly enough evidence worldwide to lend credence to your observation. However, consider who your opponents are on this topic and their views: most are European or raised in western...
For all you online date-chat stud muffins and all you freaky MySpace stalkers, beware! That cyber dreamgirl may just turn out to be a thieving Fembot.
Chump.
Whether its "God did it" or "the government did it," both religious and non-religious people are equally capable of rejecting evidence when the answers are not readily available. Ignoring evidence is not exclusively an enterprise of the religious.
You describe faith as the belief in the...
That science/faith chart is nothing more than a cleverly designed ad hominem attack on theism. Science itself is based on faith. I've noticed that people here hold to the misconception that science is the only informer of truth. This is a fundamental mistake because the belief that science is...
I may have misunderstood your post, but not intentionally. If I did miss the point of your post, It's not through any fault of my own. You claim that D'Souza is not mentally ill but at the same time delusional. Being delusional is symptomatic of a mental disorder, so I'm sure you can understand...
The focus of that debate was on whether Christianity is good for the world, not the existance of God. The claim that Christianity is responsible for the woes of the world is an argument that Sam Harris, Dawkins and the rest of the atheist movement put forth. Although I do agree that the argument...
While I understand Dawkins to be the messiah to many a atheist, I dont think it offensive to question the level of confidance he has invested in his work.
I barely past remedial math (the result of my undersized wall thumping helmet), so please be gentle. My sensibilities are delicate...
To dismiss the religious lunatic and demonstrate to all delusional God-believers what fools they are?
Ah, so he is aloof. The ole ad hom and dismiss tactic, kinda like those Christians who think they got it right eh?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.