I am very glad that an interested person responded. For me, the priority is the compliance of the project with the original, so I will analyze any reports of deviations at the first opportunity.
First of all, I'm interested in the details of the common engine. It would be nice to clearly define its boundaries in the code and, perhaps, even put it in a separate project, so as not to duplicate work. If there really is a complete match down to the bugs, then this is a great success for everyone.
Secondly, I have seen your ReMoM project, but I have not had a chance to read it, so I would be very interested to know the general status of the project and other basic information.
As common ground between the projects emerges, it will be possible to reach more specific agreements on cooperation.
P.S. I think I can build a database of common functions myself. I almost have ready code that can do this. I haven't looked at the MOO2 code yet, but the MOO1 and MOM code are definitely very similar. (Maybe I'm too optimistic about automatic data collection, but at least I'll try to do something)
P.P.S. Actually I've been playing more MOM than MOO1 lately.