Achievements

[Set]

^ 1000 hoours is over 1 month straight of playing civ in fact it is 41.666666666666666666666666666667 days.

And here is one all done in the same style (you could mix and match different elements in different styles, or keep the same theme throughout) late in the game:

Frekk I don't think that is all done as I recall in civ3 you could out trees along the path up to the palace

 

[snowlyon]

Perhaps I'm in the minority, but I find that achievements add absolutely nothing to my enjoyment of any game.

agreed~

 

[plasmacannon]

I agree with Cephalo and Piece of Mind above.
If used, because, they want to start us off with crappy leaders and force us to unlock the "good" ones, then, it will suck.
If just to complete certain minor quests, then, it could be interesting, if not overdone.

Just don't do it like college, where instructors have to "teach the test", instead of going into detail describing their topic, and spending alot of time on answering our questions without ridicule.
I can learn more reading a book myself, or watching History Channel International, then, trying to find the relevence of, why I am memorizing these name again?
Oh, that's right, someone before me, put it on a test.

The game should a game, and fun for fun's sake.
Not tasks to be completed for achievement's sake.

Someone Great before me once said, "never forget what 'Fun' is."
WD3.

 

[Avs]

Its probably going to look like this:

http://www.civfanatics.com/civrev/achievements