VincentThe88
Chieftain
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2007
- Messages
- 30
I've currently invested 5 1/2 hours into a large terra map game at normal speed and my goal is to conquer the world. Of the 8 original other civ's out there, I've destroyed 3.
Here's the breakdown of where things stand:
The year is 1755AD. I, as Julius Caesar of the Romans, am the dominant world power. I have just ended my third war against the Ottomans with his capitulation to me with 4 cities. I was tempted to destroy him, but after further thought, I decided that even his 4 cities would be a nice little buffer zone.
With Mehmed II as my vassal, there are essentially 2 other world powers remaining:
Tokugawa of the Japanese empire with the 2nd strongest military in the world.
Shaka of the Zulu with Napolean of the French, and Gandhi of the Indians, as his vassals, representing the 3rd, 4th, and 6th ranked militaries in the world respectively.
Mehmed is my buffer to the Zulu/French to the southeast, I have a direct border to the Japenese east, and Gandhi's empire I've left him consists of a half dozen cities hugging the northern coast, bordering only myself and the Japanese.
The world is at peace. And therein lies my dilemma. If I attack the Japanese, I put myself in a situation where the Indians will extend across my north border and the Zulu/French across my south. If I attack the Indians, that brings the Zulu/French into war against me.
However, I am on friendly relations with Shaka. As our last act of cooperation before declaring war on the Indians, I could give Shaka Replacable Parts and Steel to send him and his vassals to war against Japan, thus pitting my only enemies against each other. However, this would bring the Zulu close to my own level of military technology, and as I have no direct border with him, that gives him time in which he could make use of it before I could be fighting him directly.
Now, is it worth parting with these 2 technologies to the 2nd strongest world power so they'll initiate war against the 2nd strongest military? Or do I take the dangerous attempt to strike straight for the Zulu, to weaken them enough that the French and Indians may break their vassalage to Shaka, my friend, dividing the world? I am the largest nation with the largest military, however I enjoy roleplaying situations, and I find this a beautiful example of the strategic depth Civ IV allows.
So, any input or reaction from the strategists out there?
Here's the breakdown of where things stand:
The year is 1755AD. I, as Julius Caesar of the Romans, am the dominant world power. I have just ended my third war against the Ottomans with his capitulation to me with 4 cities. I was tempted to destroy him, but after further thought, I decided that even his 4 cities would be a nice little buffer zone.
With Mehmed II as my vassal, there are essentially 2 other world powers remaining:
Tokugawa of the Japanese empire with the 2nd strongest military in the world.
Shaka of the Zulu with Napolean of the French, and Gandhi of the Indians, as his vassals, representing the 3rd, 4th, and 6th ranked militaries in the world respectively.
Mehmed is my buffer to the Zulu/French to the southeast, I have a direct border to the Japenese east, and Gandhi's empire I've left him consists of a half dozen cities hugging the northern coast, bordering only myself and the Japanese.
The world is at peace. And therein lies my dilemma. If I attack the Japanese, I put myself in a situation where the Indians will extend across my north border and the Zulu/French across my south. If I attack the Indians, that brings the Zulu/French into war against me.
However, I am on friendly relations with Shaka. As our last act of cooperation before declaring war on the Indians, I could give Shaka Replacable Parts and Steel to send him and his vassals to war against Japan, thus pitting my only enemies against each other. However, this would bring the Zulu close to my own level of military technology, and as I have no direct border with him, that gives him time in which he could make use of it before I could be fighting him directly.
Now, is it worth parting with these 2 technologies to the 2nd strongest world power so they'll initiate war against the 2nd strongest military? Or do I take the dangerous attempt to strike straight for the Zulu, to weaken them enough that the French and Indians may break their vassalage to Shaka, my friend, dividing the world? I am the largest nation with the largest military, however I enjoy roleplaying situations, and I find this a beautiful example of the strategic depth Civ IV allows.
So, any input or reaction from the strategists out there?