Well, not legacy but the founding of Islam and its spread? I mean, didn't Saladin sort of succeeded Muhamad who founded Islam?
Saladin was taking back lands already made part of one of Caliphates - including Jerusalem - and then siezed by the Crusaders. And, in terms of successors, that's what the Caliphs were viewed as doing, in their succesion. Saladin was NOT a Caliph.
As @Patine said, Saladin was not a Caliph. The Caliphs are the one considered the successors to the Prophet.
Ahh.. that's right.. Saladin wasn't the successor caliphates of the prophet. I thought the inscription was 'Saladin wasn't a prophet'
.
Sayyida al-Hurra ruled over a city-state and never the Moroccan state
I am sick of the sight of Suleyman. There were three Tanzimat guys
Abdulmecid is who I’m looking for
Still, the reforms it brought could be an interesting bonus.
And have time who were more then one caliph at same time, as for example the Omiade caliphate on Spain coexist with Abássid caliphate of Bagdá.
Not so much as coëxist as having different claimants at the same time. See the Caliphate of Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr during the Umayyad Caliphate of Yazid I, or the Sokoto Caliphate in West Africa during the Ottoman Empire's Caliphate, or Ahmad al-Mansur claiming the title of Caliph whilst the Ottoman Sultan already had the title.
If it makes you feel better she was at least married to the sultan of Morocco too. If she never married and became queen/sultan consort I probably wouldn't think about her either.
Yes I know she was married to the Sultan, I believe I mentioned that before myself as well, but I could find no evidence for her having any degree of influence in Moroccan (the state) politics.
