Balence in Mesoamercia Conquest?

[Empiremaker]

I have questions about the balence of this conquest.

1. Level two archers/spears cost(I forgot the name, can't get to game right now) Archer 2/1/1, 20 Shields; Archer upgrade 3/1/1, 60 Shields
Spear 1/2/1, 20; Temple Guard 1/3/1, 60.

2. UU Obsoleteness- The civs UUs become useless with silent hunters and the upgraded archers/spears. The UUs can't win, so they can't enslave.

3. Silent Hunters, 8/5/2, 80 shields, they seem overpowered and on the defense you can trade HPs, but in that situation the attacker will usually win.

I think this conquest is very unbalenced. Am I wrong ?

 

[Evil Tyrant]

I agree, I disabled anything but UU's and spears for my game. If the real Aztecs had silent hunters the Spanish would have had their heads handed to them on a plate.

 

[Theoden]

1. I also noticed this and I find itvery unbalanced. I'd much rather have three spears than one town guard.

2. I would suggest to use bombardements to overcome this or make an army of your UU.

3. I agree they ruin balance when they become available.

 

[Himalia]

The silent hunters are without the most deadly unit in that scenario i couldnt belive it when i got access to them. That soon made short work of the enemy. I then expected to get them in the age of discovery scenario and thought this may well turn into a rought and may actually conquer Europe. Nope not in that campaign setting.