Sorta skilled archer... Good enough I hope!
Hence why i'm here. I have a skilled archer, Natural city defense, plus garrison I, 1st star, plus 1st strike and fortify. IF i calculated it right (Fortify 25%, City Defense 70%, Strength 10%) on an archer with an base strength of 3, its should be about 6.15 vs Axemen 5. So I should have a fair chance defending, right? Not to mention the uncalculated "Vs Barb" and "defend vs barb" bonuses... if you view the history screan, and drop down the COMBAT HISTORY TAB, it details strike by strike of every combat, and also details all the specific chance bonuses before the combat, and gives you the overall calculation placed before combat... though, obviously its the history tab, so its not available till its... history!!
Anyway, I had a game earlier with this same city, same map, that I fought hard for, and lost in that timeline becuase i didnt get enuf defenders there, cus I spurrd the city at a moment notice, and had only 2 skilled warrior then, and lost the city.
So I went back in time reloading first save from start of game, starting over, and took a few extra turns before sending settlers to plant city, with an archer as well. through many barb warriors, the archer is skilled. But now, there an axemen again, which I expected, was hoping not soo soon, and he two days out. I also have in the city two warriors aswell. I'm wondering if the archer will do fine alone, or if i need to sacrifice the warriors placing them in path to be attached by axemen, hoping to drop his strength. Not to mention, same days out, there is a barb warrior, from another angel, normally not worried, but even if I beat the axemen, if he'll leave archer wounded enuf to not survive warrior. So...
Just wonderin what anyone wishing to opinionate has to say.
Hence why i'm here. I have a skilled archer, Natural city defense, plus garrison I, 1st star, plus 1st strike and fortify. IF i calculated it right (Fortify 25%, City Defense 70%, Strength 10%) on an archer with an base strength of 3, its should be about 6.15 vs Axemen 5. So I should have a fair chance defending, right? Not to mention the uncalculated "Vs Barb" and "defend vs barb" bonuses... if you view the history screan, and drop down the COMBAT HISTORY TAB, it details strike by strike of every combat, and also details all the specific chance bonuses before the combat, and gives you the overall calculation placed before combat... though, obviously its the history tab, so its not available till its... history!!

Anyway, I had a game earlier with this same city, same map, that I fought hard for, and lost in that timeline becuase i didnt get enuf defenders there, cus I spurrd the city at a moment notice, and had only 2 skilled warrior then, and lost the city.
So I went back in time reloading first save from start of game, starting over, and took a few extra turns before sending settlers to plant city, with an archer as well. through many barb warriors, the archer is skilled. But now, there an axemen again, which I expected, was hoping not soo soon, and he two days out. I also have in the city two warriors aswell. I'm wondering if the archer will do fine alone, or if i need to sacrifice the warriors placing them in path to be attached by axemen, hoping to drop his strength. Not to mention, same days out, there is a barb warrior, from another angel, normally not worried, but even if I beat the axemen, if he'll leave archer wounded enuf to not survive warrior. So...
Just wonderin what anyone wishing to opinionate has to say.