migkillertwo
Prince
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2010
- Messages
- 404
Subject.
Civ 3 and 4 had conscription but Civ 5 did not. There seem to be two obvious gameplay motivations, and one historical.
On the gameplay front, government types are going to be thoroughly developed in Civ VI compared to previous titles, and conscription and the consequences thereof can provide an extra layer of strategy to this part.
Further, less developed civs are at a pretty major disadvantage in any military conflict. Conscription provides a good second-best solution to a lack of a military that would not otherwise exist.
Historically, conscription is a major part of the social pact between people and their governments, and is responsible for huge social change. Further, if not for conscription, the USSR would not have stood a chance against the German invasion.
Civ 3 and 4 had conscription but Civ 5 did not. There seem to be two obvious gameplay motivations, and one historical.
On the gameplay front, government types are going to be thoroughly developed in Civ VI compared to previous titles, and conscription and the consequences thereof can provide an extra layer of strategy to this part.
Further, less developed civs are at a pretty major disadvantage in any military conflict. Conscription provides a good second-best solution to a lack of a military that would not otherwise exist.
Historically, conscription is a major part of the social pact between people and their governments, and is responsible for huge social change. Further, if not for conscription, the USSR would not have stood a chance against the German invasion.