C3B Treaty: Exploration in NPB

Do you agree with the bottem

  • YES

    Votes: 2 15.4%
  • NO

    Votes: 10 76.9%
  • ABSTINE

    Votes: 1 7.7%

  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .

Emp.Napoleon

SUPER EMP!
Joined
Oct 19, 2002
Messages
2,006
Location
Washington, DC / San Diego, CA
Somone on our team had the Fantastic Idea of allowing exploration in each other's NPB with a worker and a other team warrior to protect it from barbs. I like this Idea and I see nothing wrong with it. In C3B's Joker's words:

<Joker> Exploration would be made with a worker with warrior (or other military unit) of the other country
<Joker> this way the worker would be protected from barbarians
<Joker> but
<Joker> going inside cultural borders
<Joker> it can´t be made outside borders because we are afraid that you put a city at the place you bocked ys
<Joker> an then we would not explore more
<Joker> of corse we would explore at your borders and you ar ours
<Joker> another point:
<Joker> when we talk about exploration by land my people are a little in doubt. Why is that? You blocked us twice, and your warrior took a lot time caming back, so we think you sould give as a worker (to explore) so everything would be balanced
 
Emp.Napoleon said:
<Joker> when we talk about exploration by land my people are a little in doubt. Why is that? You blocked us twice, and your warrior took a lot time caming back, so we think you sould give as a worker (to explore) so everything would be balanced

Is crack legal in brazil? Cause someone's been smokin! Nothing againts Emp Napoleon but we need someone who can tell them to go climb a tree when C3B makes unreasonable demands.
 
Tell him we demand two workers for being a pain in the arse! :yeah:

Edit: not a direct order
 
"... so we think you sould give as a worker (to explore) so everything would be balanced"

I sure hope I am reading this wrong or that he intended to say something else than what I am reading now, but if they think they can demand a worker from us they really need to think again! :mad:

I think that was an outrageous demand! Maybe I am starting to agree more with Matrix, but I really feel they are making a lot of demands.

Though we might be able to use this:

I want EMP to ask Joker if we have understood this correctly, or if this is some huge misunderstanding! If this is really what he thought then we should tell them that a lot of our members feel we have been insulted and that the statement worsened our realations!

Give C3B a chance to think if they hurt our relations now and that they should be more carefull with their demands.

What do you think about this?
 
So let's attack their warrior with our Jag so we have a 1/3 chance to get a worker for them :lol: .
This insulting proposal by C3B is out of the question. If they want to explore, let them send out a worker. We won't harm it. And there is no way they can ever come close to our core again. If they ever enter our cultural borders by land or by sea that is considered a declaration of war from their side. That settles the boat-debate as well.
 
Rik, that's an option worther of consideration.
 
Cheetah said:
"... so we think you sould give as a worker (to explore) so everything would be balanced"

I sure hope I am reading this wrong or that he intended to say something else than what I am reading now, but if they think they can demand a worker from us they really need to think again! :mad:


Sorry did not read that part. Now that I see it I am also angry. I will ask C3B soon if that is really what they want and if that is I will say that we rejected it. :mad:
 
Emp.Napoleon said:
Sorry did not read that part. Now that I see it I am also angry. I will ask C3B soon if that is really what they want and if that is I will say that we rejected it. :mad:

You have my permission until the end of the elections, where I wouldn't be the 'Dude' anymore.
 
Rik said it all. ;)

What I'd find a decent option is to agree we can send a worker into their territory and they may send a curragh into our territory. But they probably won't agree to that.

Perhaps it is best to back to the basics: peace. The only thing disallowed is to enter someone elses territory, and that's it.
 
magnusmarcus said:
Is crack legal in brazil? Cause someone's been smokin! Nothing againts Emp Napoleon but we need someone who can tell them to go climb a tree when C3B makes unreasonable demands.

I know I've been rough to Emp lately, but I think it is imperative that you are more aggresive! Please, tell them strenly that this is an insult; they need to realise just how rude they are being to us.
 
That's just simply insulting! They must apologise or we'll break all diplomatic relations, I say! :mad:

Worker from us because we have a landbridge that we can block entirely fairly and even let them to see our borders? The only way I think this would be acceptable would be that we get a worker and GOLD from them!

:mad:
 
Ankka said:
That's just simply insulting! They must apologise or we'll break all diplomatic relations, I say! :mad:

Worker from us because we have a landbridge that we can block entirely fairly and even let them to see our borders? The only way I think this would be acceptable would be that we get a worker and GOLD from them!

:mad:


HEAR HEAR! This is getting to the point where we need to take action. Since I still have not seen any C3B since Saterday I will cheak with them but I think that they ment what they said. WE MUST NOT BE TAKEN FOR GRANTED!
 
Emp.Napoleon said:
HEAR HEAR! This is getting to the point where we need to take action. Since I still have not seen any C3B since Saterday I will cheak with them but I think that they ment what they said. WE MUST NOT BE TAKEN FOR GRANTED!

I'm glad tos ee that you're piping a differen tune Emp :) . You had me worried there for awhile.

But before we go and yell about the insult, we need Emp. to check with them and see if they really meant that. If so, :mad:LET'S GET EM:mad:
 
NeoDemocrat said:
:mad:LET'S GET EM:mad:

What is this supposed to mean?

I'm still wondering why people some and post some bs here without seriously thinking about the game and how it evolves. I do also suspect that at least a few of our citizens have never played a Civ3 game on Emperor against AI with Persia as a neighbor.

:lol: with Bremp it would be on Sid and far beyond in order to survive. :lol:

Stop that nonsense. We need peace with C3B and we need to find some means to achieve the peace and positive attitude of Bremp. We need to offer them some good and mutually beneficial deals. So far, there are no deals suggested for mutual benefit from either side.
 
Now come on, I know how to play Civ3 and I know it would be impossible. The fact that there had been an earlier stated post that we should attack them was a play on the words. I know we can't attack them; look at my other posts, I have stated that we must appease them until their ability to attack us isn't as reasonable.

You come across as incredibly arrogant; who cares what level people have played at anyway? And to say Let's Get em can mean many things, not all in a military sense. I'll give you it looked like that but whose right is it for you to criticise what I say in the first place? Please. I think you need to realise that all people, regardless of how good and bad they are at the game, should be equally valued and not have their statements discected and insulted by anyone else on the team.

You have a problem with what I say? Ignore it! Many other people probably would as well. To humiliate a whole group of people like that is uncalled for, and it seems like you go out of your way to say you are better than a lot of us and insult others. I could care less what level you play civ on, and I could car less what Cheetah, Emp, DZ or Ankka play on as I am sure they could care less what I play on. Keep your rude comments to yourself; that may be a "Sid-sized" challenge for someone like you.
 
Very funny :lol: ... maybe we should just to piss them off
 
Back
Top Bottom