Provolution
Sage of Quatronia
Yes, like the lottery I suggested, which only me , Cyc, Ravensfire and one more voted for. Where we ranked city names and polled them in series.
blackheart said:If we don't get a satisfactory CoC up in time, use a lottery to determine city names.
President
Vice President
Domestic Consul
External Consul
Commander of Armed Forces
Resources and Technologies Consul
Culture Consul
Director of Infrastructure
Director of Commerce
Director of Expansion
Governors
Chief Justice
Judge Advocate
Public Defender
Double Stack said:I vote for CoC A, but without the Judiciary. The Judiciary should make sure that the Executive and Legisulation branches does not interfere with each other when giving their instruction to the DP and see that the CoC is enforced.
DaveShack said:Is it fair to assume your comment on the Judiciary pertains only to the role of DP?
CoolioVonHoolio said:is there a demogame every month or no? cs I WANT TO LEAD THE MARINES!!!
DaveShack said:How about this as a mock poll, let's put this before the people as soon as possible.
Which CoC do you prefer? See first post for more details.
A. Strategic Consuls first, then Tactical Directors, then Governors, then Judiciary
B. Tactical Directors, then Strategic Consuls, then Governors, then Judiciary
C. Other
D. Abstain
C. Chain of Command
1. The Chain of Command will be as follows:
a. President
b. Vice-President
c. Consul for Domestic Policy
d. Consul for External Policy
e. Consul for Cultural Policy
f. Consul for Resources and Technology Policy
g. Commander of Armed Forces
h. Director of Commerce
i. Director of Infrastructure
j. Director of Expansion
k. Governors (by order of province founding)
l. Chief Justice
m. Judge Advocate
n. Public Defender
2. If the current Designated Player cannot start the game session
in a timely manner, or cannot continue, the next official in
the chain command may take over duties of DP.
3. For the purposes of playing the save, the Judiciary is not
considered part of the Chain of Command.
if the president isnt at the chat, than he could be considered absentmad-bax said:I'm not sure that I am allowed to post here, but I would like to vote "FOR" this CoC except for the fact that it has an error which makes it unconstitutional IMO.
The second in the chain of command is an appointed position, and this is undemocratic. The Vice President only has powers in the absence of the President and would therefore be acting as President at such time. The Vice Prsident should be removed from the CoC before I could vote for it.
I have another issue with the CoC which would not prevent me voting for it.
In my view the Commander of the Armed forces is basically a micromanagement position.
In peace time therefore troop location etc should be determined from the result of city location and infrastructure etc. Troop location should not determine where cities are built and roads engineered.
In War time then the position should be promoted above everyone but the President, since the Commander must be able to influence all policy relevant to the defence of the nation, (Number of Units required, roads and railways for advancing, reinforcing positions, civil defence builds, tech procurement for necessary units and buildings etc).
mad-bax said:I'm not sure that I am allowed to post here, but I would like to vote "FOR" this CoC except for the fact that it has an error which makes it unconstitutional IMO.
The second in the chain of command is an appointed position, and this is undemocratic. The Vice President only has powers in the absence of the President and would therefore be acting as President at such time. The Vice President should be removed from the CoC before I could vote for it.
I have another issue with the CoC which would not prevent me voting for it.
In my view the Commander of the Armed forces is basically a micromanagement position.
In peace time therefore troop location etc should be determined from the result of city location and infrastructure etc. Troop location should not determine where cities are built and roads engineered.
In War time then the position should be promoted above everyone but the President, since the Commander must be able to influence all policy relevant to the defence of the nation, (Number of Units required, roads and railways for advancing, reinforcing positions, civil defence builds, tech procurement for necessary units and buildings etc).