Civ III: Conquests Patch Fix Request
- Thread starter Tavis
- Start date
). You need WinZip or WinRAR for that.This has been requested but Im going to post it anyway just because it is so important to scenarios (and actually even affected the Conquests scenarios):
Unit/Army loading in the Editor!
This is such an obvious request that Id only be wasting space by justifying it.
Unit/Army loading in the Editor!
This is such an obvious request that Id only be wasting space by justifying it.
player1 fanatic
Fanatic
Request:
Truning off auto-razing rule in editor.
Could be good for some scenarios when sttlers are disabled.
Truning off auto-razing rule in editor.
Could be good for some scenarios when sttlers are disabled.
unscratchedfoot
War is a good thing.
I second this great idea. It would be good for the napoleonic conquest cause France seems to get completely gutted by razing when I play it (although the resulting dead zone strewn with city rubble is kinduv cool). We need an option in Scenario Properties to allow or disallow city razing.
I already quoted Meateater on this before but I'll quote him again because this is obviously a big issue (it's even affecting the Conquest scenarios!):
I proposed adding 'Raze' to the Units Orders flags in the Editor. That way, you could just uncheck the order for (all) units in scenarios.
Another option that I hadn't considered is adding a 'Cannot Raze' flag in the city properties list when you R-click on a city in the Editor. That way you could determine which cities are razable and which ones aren't --but this wouldn't really affect colonization games. So really, both the city property AND the unit Order should be added.
Additionally, I would suggest tweaking the AI to not raze as much (in a previous post I mentioned that this can even be done by the player--to a certain degree--by unchecking the 'Pillage' order; tweaking the AI would be much better though because pillaging is a key strategy in Civ3).
In fact, the AI should actually come first (not only for play purposes but also because it would probably be easier than adding new features, ad more appropriate to a patch).
I proposed adding 'Raze' to the Units Orders flags in the Editor. That way, you could just uncheck the order for (all) units in scenarios.
Another option that I hadn't considered is adding a 'Cannot Raze' flag in the city properties list when you R-click on a city in the Editor. That way you could determine which cities are razable and which ones aren't --but this wouldn't really affect colonization games. So really, both the city property AND the unit Order should be added.
Additionally, I would suggest tweaking the AI to not raze as much (in a previous post I mentioned that this can even be done by the player--to a certain degree--by unchecking the 'Pillage' order; tweaking the AI would be much better though because pillaging is a key strategy in Civ3).
In fact, the AI should actually come first (not only for play purposes but also because it would probably be easier than adding new features, ad more appropriate to a patch).
JedaiNait
Chieftain
I don't know if it has been sugested before (don't feel like reading this thread the rest of this week), but it would be very nice if there was some sort of 'auto-mail-save game' in the PBEM variant.
Now every time i have to switch to outlook express, search for the file and send it. Life would be much simpeler if I could just send the file ingame. Just an extra button wich says 'save and sent to opponent' or something.
Now every time i have to switch to outlook express, search for the file and send it. Life would be much simpeler if I could just send the file ingame. Just an extra button wich says 'save and sent to opponent' or something.
Pfeffersack
Deity
Obsolete improvments still show up in the city screen and cost maintenance, pollute etc. after the got obsolete.It is very annoying to sell them individually in every city.It would be better if they get automatically sold or at least if there would be an option to sell a special building in every city.
unscratchedfoot
War is a good thing.
Commander Bello
Say No 2 Net Validations
I would love to have an option to keep this values at game's setup.
I am really not interested in the values of nations which haven't made it.
With such an option, both fractions could be satisfied.
player1 fanatic
Fanatic
Yeah, last thing you need is AI attacking your submarines on random, since they are hidden.
[EDIT: Please ignore this post. This problem does not exist.]
AI tweak: Worker will not alter Forest squares with Resources on them even when Worker has been given 'Automate' order (as opposed to 'Automate-No Altering').
This ensures that you won't lose a resource when you want the Worker to alter tile improvements and thus do not give them the no altering order.
[*]
AI tweak: Worker will not alter Forest squares with Resources on them even when Worker has been given 'Automate' order (as opposed to 'Automate-No Altering').
This ensures that you won't lose a resource when you want the Worker to alter tile improvements and thus do not give them the no altering order.
[*]
'Builder' list in Improvements and Wonders screen of the Editor.
Has the same function as the list in the Units screen of defining which civs can build a particular item.
I would also add a similar list in the Editor's Advances screen so as to be able to determine which civs can research which techs.
Has the same function as the list in the Units screen of defining which civs can build a particular item.
I would also add a similar list in the Editor's Advances screen so as to be able to determine which civs can research which techs.
As far as I am aware resources are tile dependent only - ( that is they appear on the tiles they are assigned to - using the initial tile type - if generated randomly).
Therefore altering Forest squares will not remove the resource. They are removed randomly whether you use that resource or not.
If you have chopped down a forest witha resource and then lost that resource , it was pure co-incedence. IMHO -
