douche_bag said:
I think the graphics are tottaly perfect the way they are.I mean it would be nice to have a better zoom feature but it shouldnt be 3d.
But the whole point of the 3D engine is that the graphics aren't perfect - the FLC files they are stored in are huge, the units take WAY too long to render, and are much more difficult to modify.
People seem to have the conception that 3D is harder to make. Civ3 had 3D units, but unit production time was MASSIVELY inflated because every 3D animation had to be converted to a 2D animation in attack, move, etc animation in ALL EIGHT DIRECTIONS.
Actually, I heard a preview say that Rome: Total War runs faster than it's medieval counterpart,
because it has been changed to 3D. It would also be way more portable - if you have tried Civ3 in linux, you will understand that the 2D unit animations are
headachingly painful to watch.
3D is much faster, easier to make, more portable, and more versatile. 2D pales in to insignificance by comparison.