GenocideBringer
King
- Joined
- May 29, 2005
- Messages
- 628
So I've found a few things in the Civilopedia that bother me. However, one of them just stuck out.
Read the description of Mechanized Infantry. It mentions that mechanized infantry was developed so that Infantry could keep pace with tanks. Not entirely correct, Infantry were put on trucks and APCs so they could be more mobile in general, not just to keep up with tanks.
It mentions that the job of infantry was to move in and secure area cleared out by the tanks. WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG, and anyone who has any basic grasp of military tactics knows that this is crap. Tanks are infantry support vehicles. Tanks move along with infantry to capture and hold territory, tanks acting as a strong armored fire platform, and infantry acting as the main assault/defense force. Tanks are WAY too vulnerable to too many things to be able to clear out areas alone.
/rant off. Such ridiculous errors in the civilopedia bother me. Yeah, it seems petty, but still, you'd think they would have researched it just a tad.
Read the description of Mechanized Infantry. It mentions that mechanized infantry was developed so that Infantry could keep pace with tanks. Not entirely correct, Infantry were put on trucks and APCs so they could be more mobile in general, not just to keep up with tanks.
It mentions that the job of infantry was to move in and secure area cleared out by the tanks. WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG, and anyone who has any basic grasp of military tactics knows that this is crap. Tanks are infantry support vehicles. Tanks move along with infantry to capture and hold territory, tanks acting as a strong armored fire platform, and infantry acting as the main assault/defense force. Tanks are WAY too vulnerable to too many things to be able to clear out areas alone.
/rant off. Such ridiculous errors in the civilopedia bother me. Yeah, it seems petty, but still, you'd think they would have researched it just a tad.