NeverMind Proud to be Russian Joined Apr 29, 2005 Messages 618 Location Moscow, Russia Aug 5, 2006 #1 It's fun to compare difficulty ratings of civs in RFC. So, I've made an image for a better representation Here it is. EDIT: OLD FILE DELETED
It's fun to compare difficulty ratings of civs in RFC. So, I've made an image for a better representation Here it is. EDIT: OLD FILE DELETED
Rhye 's and Fall creator Supporter Joined May 23, 2001 Messages 9,984 Location Japan / Italy / Germany Aug 5, 2006 #2 thank you, I will use this table for the strategy guide! I think you should also add the UU column. And correct "Sacriface" to "Sacrifice"
thank you, I will use this table for the strategy guide! I think you should also add the UU column. And correct "Sacriface" to "Sacrifice"
Elhoim Iron Tower Studio Dev Joined Nov 3, 2004 Messages 2,895 Location San Isidro, Argentina. Aug 5, 2006 #3 Very nice indeed!
NeverMind Proud to be Russian Joined Apr 29, 2005 Messages 618 Location Moscow, Russia Aug 5, 2006 #4 Ok, updated
D dh_epic Cold War Veteran Joined Feb 10, 2002 Messages 4,627 Location Seasonal Residences Aug 5, 2006 #5 You know, taking a look at the table, it might make sense to make some changes to the UUs. I'm especially looking at Inca, Mali, Mongol, and Aztec. I know that Mali was a medieval empire with castles and everything. Perhaps Skirmishers should be a long bow unit. Same with Mongols. I think the Keshiks might be best as Knights. (... wait, is it already?) (I'm not sure about Aztec and Inca... come to think about it.)
You know, taking a look at the table, it might make sense to make some changes to the UUs. I'm especially looking at Inca, Mali, Mongol, and Aztec. I know that Mali was a medieval empire with castles and everything. Perhaps Skirmishers should be a long bow unit. Same with Mongols. I think the Keshiks might be best as Knights. (... wait, is it already?) (I'm not sure about Aztec and Inca... come to think about it.)