Tom|420
Warlord
Had a fight with my friend about the inner working of the combat system. I decided to ask so to end the fight. Please answer only if you know the real answer (not guess/opinion) or this will just add more players into our fight.
Let's use those units for the examples (numbers all different on purpose, just to avoid confusion):
K = 4.3 (Attack 4 Defense 3)
S = 1.2
Initiator: The one who starts the combat (that is, the one who's turn it is to play)
Theory 1: Each unit attacks at each round, one after the other
K is Initiator. K attacks with 4 againts 2, if succesful S looses a hit point. Then, S attacks with 1 againts 3, if succesful K looses a hit point. And we go to next round, until one gots no more hit points.
Theory 2: The whole combat is all based on the Initiator
K is Initiator. K attacks with 4 against 2, if succesful S looses a hit point. Then, S attacks with 2 against 4, if succesful S looses a hit point. Then go to next round.
OR (variation on the same theory)
K is Initiator. K attacks with 4 against 2, if succesful S looses a hit point, else K looses a hit point. Then go to next round.
So here are the two theories we fight over. I voted for Theory 1, he voted for the 2nd one. I wrote 2 variations over Thery 2, but I believe the result is the same (or pretty similar). I believe Theory 2 gives the Initiator a better chance of success (but I'm not sure, didn't do the math).
Which of the theories is the one used in the game? Again please only answer if you know the answer for sure, or at least say you are giving your opinion/guess.
Thanks in advance
Let's use those units for the examples (numbers all different on purpose, just to avoid confusion):
K = 4.3 (Attack 4 Defense 3)
S = 1.2
Initiator: The one who starts the combat (that is, the one who's turn it is to play)
Theory 1: Each unit attacks at each round, one after the other
K is Initiator. K attacks with 4 againts 2, if succesful S looses a hit point. Then, S attacks with 1 againts 3, if succesful K looses a hit point. And we go to next round, until one gots no more hit points.
Theory 2: The whole combat is all based on the Initiator
K is Initiator. K attacks with 4 against 2, if succesful S looses a hit point. Then, S attacks with 2 against 4, if succesful S looses a hit point. Then go to next round.
OR (variation on the same theory)
K is Initiator. K attacks with 4 against 2, if succesful S looses a hit point, else K looses a hit point. Then go to next round.
So here are the two theories we fight over. I voted for Theory 1, he voted for the 2nd one. I wrote 2 variations over Thery 2, but I believe the result is the same (or pretty similar). I believe Theory 2 gives the Initiator a better chance of success (but I'm not sure, didn't do the math).
Which of the theories is the one used in the game? Again please only answer if you know the answer for sure, or at least say you are giving your opinion/guess.
Thanks in advance
