Should culture and the ability to convert people be in Civ4? Don't get me wrong... I love the culture in Civ3, it's a wonderful non-violent way to win the game, and the borders are great. BUT... has this ever happened in Real Life? The only place I can think of is Strasbourg, which is a French city but seems to be more of a German style city (arcitechture and such). All the colonies of the imperial age were rebellious despite what could be argued as the greater "culture" of the imperialist nation (I'm not saying the British have a better culture than the Indians or the Portugese of Africans or Spain of the Incans or whatever). Even when northern France was in Nazi hands, they were actively working against the foreigners. People are tied to each other and not governments, like the Basque separatists in Spain or Canada's Quebec. Only maybe the United Kingdoms combination of Celts and Scots under English rule is the only real cultural domination.
Only when there is the depopulation of natives does a culture inherit land. I doubt the colonists could really have settled if they didn't infect the Native Americans and forcibly migrate (Trail of Tears) the survivors.
And yes, American culture is spread throughout the world... but Arab youths aren't going to invite us to govern them, neither are the Latin American countries nor anyone else. It will make them more agreeable and less likely to wage war on us however. This then returns to the Senate intervening and vetoing war declaration, or citizens 10x more likely to be war weary (all the people who hate Bush anyone?)
I think that a city reverting back to its founder should be kept though. This could help contain a large militaristic empire. What say you?
Only when there is the depopulation of natives does a culture inherit land. I doubt the colonists could really have settled if they didn't infect the Native Americans and forcibly migrate (Trail of Tears) the survivors.
And yes, American culture is spread throughout the world... but Arab youths aren't going to invite us to govern them, neither are the Latin American countries nor anyone else. It will make them more agreeable and less likely to wage war on us however. This then returns to the Senate intervening and vetoing war declaration, or citizens 10x more likely to be war weary (all the people who hate Bush anyone?)
I think that a city reverting back to its founder should be kept though. This could help contain a large militaristic empire. What say you?