DG6 Gameworld Poll 6. Barbarian Level

[Provolution]

DG 6 Gameworld Poll 6 Barbarian Level

This poll will be a public, multiple choice running over 7 days, identifying the world size of DG6. The world size will impact province sizes, our government, game length and so on. You are free to vote for more than one option.
Winner is by simple plurality, meaning the one getting most votes.

Random
Sedentary (None)
Roaming
Savage
Rampaging
Abstain

 

[Black_Hole]

Abstain, these polls are premature... My comment in this thread:
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=110760

 

[Provolution]

Vote away people, not be intimidated by someones individual attempt to overrule someones interest to state their preferences. Discussions can go on for a week until it is concluded, and this is as valid as any poll pregame.

 

[Donovan Zoi]

Randomize it.

 

[Nobody]

roaming yeah roaming

 

[Ashburnham]

Randomize it.

I'll second that.

 

[Black_Hole]

isnt raging an option...
also provo hopefully you dont get mad for correcting you, but sedentary and none are different things.
None means well no barbs at all while sedentary means only huts and villages... so barbs only come if u attack a hut and they pop up

 

[Provolution]

I left out None on purpose.

 

[Civanator]

Raging/Rampaging and Restless/Savage, they're the same thing. I like it when a 30+ stack of horseman try to destroy my civlization, but a way to stop it is to just settle an empty city in the middle of nowhere and they'll all pour into it and disappear.

 

[Black_Hole]

I left out None on purpose.

so what if i didnt want barbarians?

 

[Provolution]

That is very hypothetical. You can decide to pick on every action I do, but I rightfully assumed the majority wanted barbarians after last game, where rampaging was very slow. I still wonder why you have this confrontational stance.

 

[Black_Hole]

That is very hypothetical. You can decide to pick on every action I do, but I rightfully assumed the majority wanted barbarians after last game, where rampaging was very slow. I still wonder why you have this confrontational stance.

do you really have to get mad, all because I pointed out you should have a poll option?

 

[Provolution]

I did not get mad, I just observe your comment patterns, that is all.

 

[DaveShack]

It is usually a poor practice to leave off an important option like none. I would make this comment no matter who opened a poll.

In this case I would not vote for none, but will deprive nobody from their option to pick such a choice.

 

[Provolution]

fair enough, I can make a new poll for the courtesy of people. I guess the new polling regime would be to include also unlikely poll options. But as long as we agree on that, I am fair game. I post a new poll right away. Now that the petition is dead, there is no time
to lose.