1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

DID: the perfect plan to master civ

Discussion in 'Civ3 Strategy Articles' started by Ari, Jan 20, 2002.

  1. Ari

    Ari Chieftain

    Jan 17, 2002
    a house, Imatra, Finland
    Deity is the level I play, so all that I say is true at least there. I use the patched version of the game.

    As I have told to people how to play to win, they have told me to enjoy the game. I don't understand. I enjoy the game. To me, enjoying means: Try to win using every possible in-game method. So I try to win. If you are not interested to hear the perfect plan to master civ, there's no point reading further.

    Think it like this: Anyone can drive a car in a summer's sunshine on a highway. But only true pro's can drive F1 or indy-car. And they drive it fast. I play civ's the same way. To beat them all.

    This game has several bad flaws.

    1. The ships are too slow compared to walking units. There's no point to use ships to move troops on the same continent. Historically, a failure.

    2. There's no group move. Why has every individual unit to be moved individually? Why do I have to give GoTo orders to every unit?

    3. There's no logistics. A unit can be in the middle of hostile enemy territory, still not taking any damage from hunger or losing it's equipment(arrows etc.) And it still costs money to maintain it. I was in war with romans and had a lone hoplite standing in the middle of their territory, in a mountain observing their movements. There was no way to supply that unit. And it still cost me one gold every turn. Where did that money go?

    4. The AI is lousy.

    Now, the numbers 1-3 can't be used to player's advantage in the game, but 4 surely can.

    At deity, AI gets a huge starting bonus and produces a lot faster. There's no way a human could prevent AI to have 6-8 cities while having only 2-3 by himself. There's no way to peacefully build and produce out of that pit, the AI is just too large and you too small. The only way out is the military way.

    AI receives at start a lot free units, I don't know how many, but they are a lot. And still, they can be beaten.

    4.1. AI doesn't take it's resources to use immediately(iron, horses)

    4.2. AI doesn't protect it's resources at all. At least I haven't noticed.

    4.3. AI doesn't attack your resources, unless yu need colonies.

    4.4. AI:s primary interest is to protect it's own cities.

    4.5. AI units follow you to open.

    4.6. AI units attack sometimes when you are in the mountains.

    4.7. While at war, AI usually starts to build things like Pyramids or Hanging gardens instead of units.

    4.8. AI doesn't use it's workers effectively.

    4.9. It's possible to manipulate other AI:s to declare war to the civ you fight with, regardless of their own possibilities or relationships between them.

    4.10. AI doesn't react properly to a threat an aggressive human player presents to it's existence. DECISION INITIATIVE DANCE

    4.11. AI doesn't realize when the war is lost.

    4.12. For some obscure reason, AI won't use barracks.

    4.13. AI doesn't use workers at war.

    4.14. AI attacks workers.

    4.15. AI uses units as individuals.

    In the following I use a simple example. I play the Greeks and my rivals are Romans nearby and Egyptians behind them. The rest are on a separate island, and won't interact a lot.

    Greeks have Hoplite. Truly great defender. The romans are militaristic and they have legions. Same defense as the hoplites have and good attack. So, if Greeks go to offense in ancient times, Romans should be absolutely victorious, right?

    Wrong. If I start to develop iron working at the beginning, I'll probably get it the same time the romans get it too. It's my first discovery and to them about 6th. They have 9 cities, I have 3. There are two irons visible, the other in our border and the other in the middle of Roman territory. I build a settler and secure that iron to me, using two workers to make a necessary road. Then I start to build swordsmen, fearing all the time the dreaded legions, their special unit. I use one of my workers to spy on roman road construction, and there's one worker at sight, quickly irrigating.

    4.1. is true in most games I've played.

    After I built a massive army of 3 veteran swordsmen, I went to invasion. I had 4 cities building units, 2 normal and 2 despot rush. At first I went to the roman iron, there weren't still any workers at sight.

    I've never seen AI to either protect it's strategic resources or attack mine. Why? 4.2, 4.3

    A few turns after the declaration of war and the fall of first roman city, they started to build the Oracle. Why? Why didn't they build units? 4.7.

    A roman bunch of 4 archers and 4 spearmen approaches, while I have only two swordsmen in defense, 3 in attack. The solution? I move my swordsmen close to Rome, 6 of that bunch turn back to "protect" the Rome, leaving 2 behind to be slaughtered. Works EVERY time. The threat needs to be "credible", i.e. needs to be at least two offensive units(warriors, spearmen... won't do) 4.4.

    4.5. AI can take advantage of mountains. However, if you retreat from mountains to grassland, they follow you kindly to the flat too, just in front of your waiting swordsmen. Poor AI. And sometimes they attack you at mountains, though there's no true need to do that. Never do that, it's not worth it. The only exception are wounded fast units. (4.6.)

    4.8. AI uses it's workers to irrigate and build mines around the towns instead of linking it's towns to each others. That is the primary job of a worker. To link your cities with each others and with your advancing army. That's why Rome controlled all the med for a thousand years. If there's spare time from building network of connection, then your workers can build mines or sometimes irrigation.

    4.9. Back to example. My swordsmen surrounded the city of Rome, size of 12 and wonders inside. AI didn't bring help, so I captured it, losing one swordsman in battle.

    There's nothing I could have done to prevent Rome from jumping back to romans, so I garrisoned my units there for only one turn. For some strange reason, cities never change owner immediately after capture, but almost always after one turn of control, if they are big enough.

    Pre-patch, I would have sold Rome to romans for several smaller cities and then captured it again. This could have been repeated endlessly.

    Patch fixed that, so that was not an option. Roman army was in ruins and their capital in my hands, but they still didn't want peace hard enough to give me few cities. So I talked to their friends the egyptians, who didn't want to pay anything for it, but became gracious towards me as I gave it for free.

    The romans got angry to Egyptians and declared war on them, capturing Rome, but not garrisoning it strongly, when I came and took it again. It had reduced in size enough for me to be able to hold it. And now the egyptian were at war with romans too. They didn't accomplish anything, but at least they couldn't ally against me.

    4.11. The romans had lost the war, their cities steadily falling to my hands and my armies in the total control of the countryside. Still they didn't surrender and beg for peace. They had no chance, but kept on fighting. Brave, but stupid.

    4.12. During the war, I used only veteran or elite swordsmen, romans only regulars. Can't they build barracks? Veteran is about twice as good as veteran, AND it has a far greater chance of eventually producing a leader. If a veteran swordsman attacks a regular spearman fortified in a town, 4 out of 5 attacks result in swordsmans victory.

    4.13. Immediately after war breaks out, AI draws all workers from the front to his cities, instead of sending them to the back to be useful. Now they just get captured when the city falls. Workers are NEEDED in the war: they build the roads your armies walk.

    4.14. If there's a worker and a military unit side by side, which one does the AI attack? The worker. Why? It poses no direct threat, unlike the unit, and it can be captured back, unlike the unit which is lost forever. This is so unfair a tactic, I use it nomore, AI can be noseled using the same workers again and again after they are captured back. And AI loses it's units under my attacks. What's the point? Why to attack workers??

    4.15. Romans had about three times as much units as I had, archers and warriors. Despite of their inferior quality compared to swordsmen, they would have overrun me if they had come as a total attack from all direction. But no, they came by ones and twos, allowing me to heal between attacks and to get elite. I used my precious units in pairs or fours, protecting each others and finishing units other's had wounded. I left no death of my swordsman unrevenged, they left almost everyone of my wounded swordsmen alive. I protected my wounded and I got elites, they got dead units.

    4.10. Though all these are serious flaws, this last one is lethal. The AI has no goal. It's aim always misses, because there's no goal. When I start playing I have a clear goal(I want to win/I'll try to win by culture with no aggression/I'll play like Simcity/...)and I go towards that goal all the time. Everything I do, I do to achieve that goal. When I go to war, I'll set a clear goal and go until I reach it. This is called DECISION. AI is indecisive. The goal is needed to avoid indecision. I use all my resources to reach that goal.

    When I have a goal I take the INITIATIVE in my hands. Initiative means that I decide where to fight, who to fight and how to fight. That is the thing that generals in the real world try to get. Initiative brings the strategic victory.

    The initiative is taken by learning the DANCE. Dance means the way AI thinks, where it will concentrate it's units, where it will move that archer over there, how do I move my swordsman to get that spearman to flat ground... Dance brings the tactical victory.

    After I had won the war against the romans, and they would have agreed to peace, and I had enough room to develop my civ, one question was left unanswered. Why would I stop here and go peaceful? I had the strongest army in the whole world. If all the four others had brought their entire armies to the field, I still believe I would have won them. I had plenty of swordsmen, though my cities had been building improvements for a while already. So I decided. Genocide to the romans and most likely to the egyptians. That would consume my swordsmen so they wouldn't go waste, but I'd still win the egyptians. At that point, there would be a point to become a peaceful republic contesting only economically.

    If you have army, use it. There's no point disbanding it just because you've achived your goals. Set new ones. Or perhaps you can disband if you feel the challence would otherwise be too low.
    Use all your resources effectively, and you will win.

    P.S. Does anybody know why swordsmen won't upgrade and who builds swordsmen in modern era?
  2. Lt. 'Killer' M.

    Lt. 'Killer' M. Chieftain

    Dec 5, 2001
    :goodjob: :goodjob: :goodjob:

    could have been written by me :D

    just one little add-on:

    shortly before you exterminate a civ, give them peace. But demand everything they are willing to give. Usually they won`t guive towns, but all their tech and money, hehehehehe. Then go and do it again. And again. Oh, they have a city left? Declare war, kill one unit, withdraw, come back - they`ll fall for it again. Now kill them.

    Once isn`t enough on Deity, since you need to go through the tech tree, i.e. if you don`t know Feudalism they can`t give you Chivalry. so repeat the process until you know everything they do. Then kill them otherwise they`re gonna give trouble whenever they can...
  3. Furry Spatula

    Furry Spatula ...

    Dec 16, 2001
    Actually i have had the AI attack one of my iron sources once :)
  4. fvbinsd

    fvbinsd Chieftain

    Jan 27, 2002
    Using 1.17f, I have had a roving spearman attack my iron and horse supplies inside my borders. I have also seen them cut roads and destroy irrigation if there are no obvious targets around to attack.

    This may be a 1.17 improvement.

    Otherwise, great post!
  5. Lt. 'Killer' M.

    Lt. 'Killer' M. Chieftain

    Dec 5, 2001
    you have to watch your res and lux now a lot more then with 1.16
  6. Squiggy

    Squiggy Chieftain

    Nov 4, 2001
    Yes, even with 1.16, the AI would often send spearmen and pikemen into my territory to cut up roads. They cut up any roads they see, giving priority to resources. They don't take it to the extreme, but they are a threat.
  7. Raijer

    Raijer The 736th Beatle Supporter

    Jul 29, 2002
    San Diego, CA
    This is a very informative post, however, I do have to side with the others concerning resources. I have seen AI, on more than one occsion, systematically attack resources. They go straight for them, as well as important linking roads, then pillage away. I often find myself building fortresses on them when I can.

    Another observation that I haven't shared with you Ari, is the AI sending one or two invaders at a time instead of marching them in one large force. I am currently playing a game at Warlord level, and the Egyptians are sending ridiculously large numbers of charriots at me. Wave after wave of asp-bitten mongrols... my spearman are no doubt::eek: !!

    On the plus side, I have to try the enemy-city-giveaway strategy. I've been looking for a good way to manipulate the AI civs into going to war with each other, if only to give me a little breathing room. This sounds brilliant!

    btw, I'm playing on 1.29 - perhaps this is the differing factor.
  8. sabo

    sabo My Ancestors were Vikings

    May 29, 2002
    Minneapolis, City of Lakes
    I am at a loss as too the AI's logic also, sometimes I experience what Ari has mentioned but other times I"ve seen coordiated attacks, with the AI using ALOT of units, and I have also seen the AI using Arty and battleships in an offensive role, the only thing I haven't seen is the AI using "combined arms" effectively. In other words I've seen arty softening up a stack with bombardment but then the AI sometimes will and sometimes will not follow up and attach with units to finish me off.
  9. Hirachi Dinavo

    Hirachi Dinavo Emperor of the World

    Apr 9, 2004
    The Shadow Realm
    I have seen the AI use good attacks with large stacks of units when they declare war on me, but if I declare war on them, they attack with 2 or 3 units.

    Also, in late game the AI will bombard the railroads on my resources and then stop, leaving the road. So I go back and rebuild the railroad. And they bomb it again. They never destroy the road, so I always have the resource.
  10. Swiss Bezerker

    Swiss Bezerker Chieftain

    Jan 14, 2005
    somewhere up north
    The thing about building wonders is very true.
    Tip: wait till they are done the wonder then capture the city.using F7 u can check wich city is building the wonder and fortify your troops outside it.
  11. sabo

    sabo My Ancestors were Vikings

    May 29, 2002
    Minneapolis, City of Lakes
    Yes this works great getting the GL, I usually have no trouble building it on Emporer and below, but deity and beyond I need to capture it most of the time.
  12. Doc Tsiolkovski

    Doc Tsiolkovski Deity

    May 4, 2003
    Köln, Cologne, Colonia. Finally.
    I'd be careful with the original article. It is a whopping 3 years old, and contained a lot of incorrect observations even for that time, not to speak of C3C. And it refers to a situation where you of course have no problems (you are Greece and have Iron, your neighbor is Rome and lacks it :crazyeye: ).
    The wonders, ok, that works.
  13. zerksees

    zerksees in remission

    Feb 19, 2003
    Wadsworth Ohio USA
    I am quite surprised how many of the items Ari listed as problems with the AI are "fixed".

    However, the underlying problem is still there. IMO the AI still makes bad decisions and is still indecisive. Some bad decisions I still see:

    - The AI's fight among each other when I have over half the power bar
    - My "weak" military consistently crushes the AI players
    - The AI is so tempted by undefended cities in the back. If I thought the AI could reach them in one turn they would not be undefended!
    - We all know the AI will run out of units. When a war starts an AI will throw their free units at you right away. After a few turns of beating them down a time comes when they "run out of units". At this point a small steady stream of units come, and these are easily managed.
    - AI units are rarely focused on one city or objective. When I attack I like to focus all resources on one city at a time, or make sure I have enough units to reach all my objectives. The AI will attack several places lacking the punch to succeed in most or all cases.

    Other than pointing out the flaw of bad decisions I am not sure this article has much value to me.

Share This Page