As far as I can see, the only problem with this statement is "Lord George Washington the Great Terrible". Take that away and perhaps substitute neo-fascism for fascism and it looks pretty accurate.
Take that away and perhaps substitute neo-fascism for fascism and it looks pretty accurate.
neo-fascism
Man, Eurasia must be pretty irradiated right now. Just like how Russia is planning to bury China in nukes soon too because of that high scores thing, right?
blitzkrieg1980 said:BTW, ideologies are immortal as long as societies invest their trust/beliefs in them. This is especially powerful in a society with a forced rotation of leaders so that (supposedly) no one leader can corrupt the ideology. I imagine a domination "victory" is something that plenty of societies AND sociopathic leaders IRL have sought after... ever heard of WW2?
Did I mention ideology? I said rulers, and specifically immortal sociopathic rulers who wouldn't hesitate in waging 2000-yr wars for extremely nebulous reasons.
e: the point I'm getting is that real-life is a bad example to parallel CiV to. The only thing that might hold true is that nations are after their own self-interests first and foremost, and even then its rather dubious given the mouth-frothin' kamikaze mentality they occasionally display in-game.