Posting from a mobile phone sucks, so some elaboration will be avoided.
It is interesting how some of the authors who wrote in english are sensitive, while other famous ones are just bland. In a literature with so many famous names, in a language spoken by so many people, i did somewhat expect a bigger conformity to a supposed (discovered) ideal or standard.
I like sensitive writers, and was happy reading poe and stevenson, and even some work by dunsany. Lovecraft is -as borges noted- indeed sonewhat "unconciously parodying poe", while i could never like dickens and his newspaper article-writer prose style.
And although a large number of early-mid 20th century english speaking writers are to degrees tied to romanticism (which i like) most of them aren't very good at it, imo.
Lovecraft has his truck-driver moments of crudeness, and so does his welsh cousin, Machen. Henry james is an interesting case, yet much is lost in his convoluted and bloated narrative.
I guess that the victorian era was enough to forge a phantasm, but not a nobler imprint in the world of letters. Or just that the individual talent is the only aspect of paramount importance?
It is interesting how some of the authors who wrote in english are sensitive, while other famous ones are just bland. In a literature with so many famous names, in a language spoken by so many people, i did somewhat expect a bigger conformity to a supposed (discovered) ideal or standard.
I like sensitive writers, and was happy reading poe and stevenson, and even some work by dunsany. Lovecraft is -as borges noted- indeed sonewhat "unconciously parodying poe", while i could never like dickens and his newspaper article-writer prose style.
And although a large number of early-mid 20th century english speaking writers are to degrees tied to romanticism (which i like) most of them aren't very good at it, imo.
Lovecraft has his truck-driver moments of crudeness, and so does his welsh cousin, Machen. Henry james is an interesting case, yet much is lost in his convoluted and bloated narrative.
I guess that the victorian era was enough to forge a phantasm, but not a nobler imprint in the world of letters. Or just that the individual talent is the only aspect of paramount importance?
Last edited: