Dux1
Warlord
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2010
- Messages
- 134
I think we all know that with the way the tech and civics trees are set up in Civ VI, progression through tech eras can happen at an extremely rapid pace. It is even possible to skip entire eras at times: Rushing Cartography, for example, allows the player to progress from the Classical Era directly into the Renaissance Era, skipping the Medieval Era.
I don't think the flexibility built into the tech tree was an accident, but it feels like the way in which your current era is established doesn't work well with this flexibility. It might be interesting to have a civilization learn how to cross oceans at a time far earlier than is historical, but if all other technology was put on hold to achieve this goal, is it really accurate to describe this civilization as being in the "Renaissance Era"?
While the obvious fix to era progression speed would be to add many more prerequisites for each technology, I believe the flexibility we currently have could be maintained if era determination was no longer based on researching any tech in that era. One idea would be to change it so that era progression only occurs after, say, half of the techs or civics from that era are researched. This would allow for the currently flexibility in technology choice, but it would prevent reaching the Industrial Era (and having all of the benefits and penalties associated with this era) before 1000 AD.
Thoughts?
I don't think the flexibility built into the tech tree was an accident, but it feels like the way in which your current era is established doesn't work well with this flexibility. It might be interesting to have a civilization learn how to cross oceans at a time far earlier than is historical, but if all other technology was put on hold to achieve this goal, is it really accurate to describe this civilization as being in the "Renaissance Era"?
While the obvious fix to era progression speed would be to add many more prerequisites for each technology, I believe the flexibility we currently have could be maintained if era determination was no longer based on researching any tech in that era. One idea would be to change it so that era progression only occurs after, say, half of the techs or civics from that era are researched. This would allow for the currently flexibility in technology choice, but it would prevent reaching the Industrial Era (and having all of the benefits and penalties associated with this era) before 1000 AD.
Thoughts?