Interesting, but I had always drawn my reasoning from this part
update 10 said:
The same plague appears to have struck the Hallowed city of Freetown although it appears to be isolated to those involved in trade with the dwarves of Luciedo.
Now my assault on Black Tower only used troops stationed in Freetown, who, as soldiers, obviously were not trading with Luciedo that turn. So why, when they show up in Black Tower, are they infected by the disease? My theory accounts for all the infections
1. Black Tower troops & residents - posioned outpost
2. Luciedo - poisoned by scouts who scouted Black Tower and then returned
3. Freetown - poisoned by "trade with the dwarves of Luciedo"
So, the only way I could say that the Als spread it would be if the plague somehow contradicted the update and did spread to people that weren't "involved in trade with the dwarves of Luciedo." On the other hand, you do point out a good fact with the mention of no deaths in Black Tower. However, I know that deaths did eventually happen, I had to rerecruit for those units, so it is just a question of which deaths happened first. Read one way, the update can imply what your saying, but I have to weigh that against the explicit statement that only those trading with Luciedo were affected. Also, I kind of took your lack of denial as a sign of guilt, even if that wasn't an entirely fair in-character move.
On the issue of the Als village plague, I honestly thought it was unrelated to mine and was a random event. In fact, I thought myself pretty clever for using it as common ground for forming an alliance. My in-character leaders, on the other hand didn't understand the subtleties of the random event generator, thought that we were both poisoned by the Sidar. Both OOC and IC I was pretty sure that the Sidar "secret project" was the plague being produced and distributed.
orangelex44 said:
As for this being OOC, well, I am kind of raising it as an OOC issue but had I thought to do it before I would've done it more officially, and directly to the citizens of the Luichirp. Just think of this whole bit as a kind letter from the new Sidar leader to our kind neighbors of the west.
Should I take this as an informal in-character message to the Luchuirp? I promise you'll get a response, though it might not be the one you want. I'd really like to get that diplo channel open after the past 100 years or so of no contact.
kenkrajen said:
lol. ur ruse to split us up in the story didnt work, so now ur trying to get us to point fingers at each other ooc? bad form. makes you look down right petty, really.
I understand how you could be annoyed, but I don't really take any offense to it - no matter who it was that poisoned me. I guess I'm just really accepting of anything in a game with diplomacy - personally I don't feel comfortable dealing with many deceptive tactics but I consider that a restriction I place on myself because of a prefered playstyle, not a general rule that determines whether someone is a bad or good player.
When it comes down to it, this issue is really close to decide, but I'm still leaning towards my earlier reasoning a bit. Maybe you can change my mind, who knows?
