Firaxis is stupid.....

akinkhoo

Biotechnologist
Joined
Nov 14, 2001
Messages
286
Location
Singapore
my conclusion is fraxis is stupid..... it is not like they didn't try and make a good game..... but they tried and made a game worst than their last..... :rolleyes:

i understand the poor AI can be a bad judgement call by fraxis.... but not providing the ability to edit those rules in the game properly just show how dumb they are.... sure they will release a new editor, but what is needed is a simple, fully edit-able rules.....

WHAT HAPPEN TO RULES.TXT :confused:
 
BLASPHEMY!!!

DEATH TO THE DISBELIEVERS!

YOU ARE RIGHT ABOOT TE AI BUT I DONT CARE!

PREPARE TO BE ASSIMILATED!

YOUR BIOLOGICAL DISTINCTIVENISS WILL BE ADDED TO OUR OWN!!!

RESISTANCE IS FUTILE IN YOUR CASE!!!
.
.
.
Ahem, sorry about that... *We are the borg, prepare to be*- Uh, it happens sometimes, Armada withdrawl you see, I have been laying klingon academy instead. :lol:

*Comm, order escorts to sttack our target... Sir! Our dorsal shield is buckling! We have sustained heavy damage to our primary weapons! Lifesupport failing! Total loss of crew immenent!*- What the poor mother on the other side of my quantom torpedoes heard.
 
ROFLOL!!!

I hope that you dont take me seriosly! ;-)

I was talking to both of you! After all, Firaxis has provided me with countless hours of quality gaming, though the AI does stink like poop.

ALL HAIL PHARAOH! :egypt:
 
Let there be peace. Firaxis may have done a game that did not met the expectations around it, but that is not enough for you to insult them.
 
If you don't like the game why do you come here? Go to some other gaming forum for some game you do like? Why do you bother to post 120 posts if the game sucks?

Its odd how all the people who say the game sucks, play it still rather than Civ2.
 
Very, take Zouave for example, she/he has been posting about C3's flaws for months... Yet still playes it! I think that the hypocrite loves the game! :-)
 
Unless you can create a better civilization based game then stop complaining.(Not in theory but in real programming)
 
Originally posted by cat98
Very, take Zouave for example, she/he has been posting about C3's flaws for months... Yet still playes it! I think that the hypocrite loves the game! :-)

Zouave, a guy, like the game. He knows that Firaxis could make better, that's why he posts here: To help improve the game because he cares.

He is not hypocrite, he really thinks what he writes.
 
'Fraxis is stupid'

Anyone get the irony here :D
 
}:-)
 
We're talking about Firaxis, the guys that brought us SMAC, so I think expectations are high, and they're not "stupid"... rather, I'm suspecting that Infogrammes forced them to make some bad decisions along the CivIII development process.
 
Originally posted by cat98
Very, take Zouave for example, she/he has been posting about C3's flaws for months... Yet still playes it! I think that the hypocrite loves the game! :-)

A fair question, although filled with derogatory cracks. Typical.

Here is the answer. . .

I waited over five years for Civ 3 and spent countless hours discussing what it should be after Civ 2 came out. The result?? Firaxis does a buggy and beta Civ 3 and ignored most of what we wanted; it leaves out vital game features such as scenarios and Cheat Mode; gives us a simplified and LESS realistic game; throws in crazy concepts such as Settler Diarrhea, Culture Flipping, and massive corruption; and removes all the fun of spying and naval warfare. Plus it offers up an AI that is not only dumb but IN YOUR FACE and cheats. The game is also a giant step back historically.

So all Firaxis has to do is GET IT RIGHT. Or, promise us, and show us the legally-binding documents, that Firaxis will NOT do Civ 4.

As for me, I am nearing burn out.

Civ 3 is most interesting when playing on a large map with a dozen or more other civs. Unfortunately, the game is so slow in the Modern period it soon becomes an exercsie in tedium, especially when moving huge numbers of individual units. The 'J' command only slightly helps, especially as you still have to wake up every fortified unit.

On smaller maps, the AI is akin to fighting a ******** person with a 70 IQ (at best) with a real evil streak who cheats. I'm tired of the same stupid AI moves, or the same Diplomatic CRAP where the AI refuses some great deal owing to some bullbleep about my reputation - something that occured three thousand years earlier when some civ attacked ME. :crazyeye:

If we had SCENARIOS we could get right into a Modern Era game with a manageable number of units. But we have no scenarios.

So I'm playing it less and less, even though I well know the system, unlike other games such as Europa Universalis II. The smaller maps are too easy to win, or AI cheating too outrageous, or, with the larger maps, it is too time consuming and tedious, in addition to the other problems.

So maybe I'll be on the EU 2 boards soon. You can only fool so many people, Firaxis.

And your AI does "stink like poop". It's a damn shame after we waited this long for Civ 3. :(
 
Originally posted by LaRo


Zouave, a guy, like the game. He knows that Firaxis could make better, that's why he posts here: To help improve the game because he cares.

He is not hypocrite, he really thinks what he writes.

EXACTLY.

My purpose is both didactic and instructive for the characters at Firaxis, and as a consumer watchdog who does not quietly accept inferior products.

I have played it a LOT, though, so it must have had some good points. It does. There are some improvements over Civ 2. But the irritations of it are really too much. These problems Firaxis should have fixed before they marketed it. THEY STILL CAN.
 
Zouave: All I see you say is AI cheats, game was a rip-off/beta test, culture flipping sucks, Civ 2 is better, since I can't do it, its a bug etc. All your posts are the same.

Now if you are losing interest in Civ3 I guess you don't need to stay here any longer. Maybe go off to some Europa Universalles forum. I don't this as a "go away and don't come back", but mean as if I wasn't playing the game anymore and was bored with it, I wouldn't bother coming back here to read about it and whatnot.

Since Civ 2 didn't have culture flipping and all, why not play that and praise the game in the Civ2 forums?
 
You have my most humble apologies Zouave. My 'derogatory comments' come all too naturally for me, and as such people often take offence to what I say. I did not mean to offend you, though looking back I can see why it would. :egypt:

ALL HAIL PHARAOH's QUICK APOLOGY RESPONCE TEAM!
- Stuff like that for instance, usually detracts from any seriousness that I attemp to portray in my posts...
 
Originally posted by God
Zouave: All I see you say is AI cheats, game was a rip-off/beta test, culture flipping sucks, Civ 2 is better, since I can't do it, its a bug etc. All your posts are the same.


Not true. One guy posted that the AI cheats by allocating better terrain, resources, etc., to itself. Zoave replied that the AI does not cheat in this particular manner. I have witnessed Zoave being fair and thoughtful!

:)
 
Back
Top Bottom