It is quite obvious that we have lost our chances for victory. Now the question is whether we will survive. I'd like to try.
In case we have lost there is a new game strating up, I suppouse. In that case, Yahzuk, please let me know when do you start the appointments for mayor list, because I'd like to be on it.
My last suggestion regarding the rules. Maybe you should be the one to choose city location, not the mayor. From the role playing perspective is even more correct. An emperor creates a settling party, gives command over it to one of the nobles, and directs him to go and place a city somewhere.
In that case the noble might be even able to choose which side of the river the city will be placed on but definetely his not the one to choose in which region the city will be placed.
Have been lurking on this post for a while. Well done, thanks for putting in the effort everyone was a joy to read.

I would agree with grzybek's thought. I think that similar to all other decisions in that there should be a vote on where the next city should go, with the new mayor having some sort of say it in. I don't know exactly how the mechanics would work, but I think this would be interesting.
I this game, I think that it woudl have been an interesting vote on where to found the 4th city (Troyes?), with Paris wanting to place it on the front lines to relieve pressure from germany, yahzuk probably wanting to place it on the iron, and the other mayors falling on one side or the other.