Never heard of him (or actually I think I have, but his name never stuck), but after Googling him, he seems worthy of being on my list.Siegmund said:Left to a completely free choice, I would be inclined to choose Karl Friedrich Gauss - contributed as much to mathematics as anyone but Euler, as much for physics as Maxwell, also a surveyor, etc etc etc... one of the last men to contribute greatly to a long list of fields.
Who's Feynman?col said:Newton. Towering genius. Only Feyman comes close. (Why isnt he on the list?)
Well, even though he was wrong in just about everything he said (if I'm not mistaken), he did pretty much launch a new scientific field.Mrogreturns said:Why is Freud on a list of scientists?
Party pooper.CruddyLeper said:I think all scientists were great... but I don't see how the sense of having a "greatest".
I mean, science is supposed to be based on experimentation... so does that mean the luckiest scientist is the greatest? Or the best at guessing the outcome?
Luck and guessing ability don't really go with "greatness" in my eyes. Sorry for the downer.
Why? You're free to discuss Eastern scientists. So are you going to?aaminion00 said:Someone should definetly change the name of this thread to "Greatest Western Scientist in History"
WillJ said:Why? You're free to discuss Eastern scientists. So are you going to?
Truth be told, I can't think of any major Eastern scientists, unless you count ancient inventors and such who weren't really scientists (Ts'ai Lun, etc.).
HalfBadger said:Where is Pythagarous (sp?) and his crew, they figured out the the phythagoran (p?) theorem, for calculating triangles. Without the knowledge of how triangles interacts with itself, there'd be no map making, or easy way to calculate distances, which is important for physics.
Yep, my list is heavily West-biased (thanks to my Western education, of course), but I'd like to stress that this thread shouldn't be centered around my list.aaminion00 said:Nobody's blaming you, I'm just saying that pretty much your whole list is from Europe and there might be some who consider someone from Asia or the Middle East to be the greatest scientist ever. What about Mohammed al-Khowarizmi? Algebra is named after one of his works, because he made such major contributions to it. He also was key in the development of trigonometry and astronomy, and even explored calculus. I think he at least deserves a mention. There are others too.
By "greatest" I really mean largest contribution (which is of course still pretty much a matter of opinion).zeon252 said:It's really in the eye of the beholder. What do you mean by greatest? If it's the greatest for human health thatn that would probobly be Pasteur, astrology, Galileo, History of the earth, Darwin. Most famous(currentl) Einstein. anyway Pasteur got my vote because I'm biased towards France![]()
Well, Pythagarous was the first to mathematically prove it. But you're right, it was put into use before him, and thus HalfBadger is mistaken about his importance (if I understand his post correctly).America444 said:Actually the theorm was used by ancient egyption surveyors and was known to the babylonians at least 1000 years earlier.
I wouldn't include Hawking. There's no question he was an excellent scientist and his work on Hawking radiation was brilliant. However, he was not a revolutionary character like Einstein or Mendeleev were.ferenginar said:I'm with Col on this one, though I would also include Hawking.