Hebrew civilization

Wow! This thread has got way long! So allow me to jump in.
If the question is “Do the Hebrews deserve to be represented in the game?” my answer is clear, Yes! As any other historic people that made their contributions to the human civilization.
On the other hand if the question is put a little differently as in “Firaxis must include a Hebrew civilization”, I should answer No. there is no “Must” here.
Of course the discussion here has gone so far beyond the simple question put either way. In fact some parts of this thread are way beyond the spirit of the game as I understand it. In my view Civilization is about one sole civilization aka the Human Civilization that evolved through history by the accumulation of an endless number of contributions that people of all races, cultures, countries, religions, … have made.
If it occurs to you to play at say Settler difficulty your civ would establish all religions and build all wonders! This is not a pointless concept. Human accomplishments are “well” human. It happened that this or that people was in the right place, time, mode, and circumstances to make such and such achievement. There is nothing genetically magical about ancient Egyptians or Sumerians that aided them in being the oldest sedentary civilizations that left their mark on history. There might have been older civilizations that went out of existence without leaving enough evidence of their achievements.
In my view, there is no unique people. There are people under unique circumstances that accordingly acted in a unique way. Let’s take the Hebrews. Imagine that no major religion was based on the Hebrew tradition. If there was no Christianity, nor Islam. Would Hebrews attain the same recognition of their achievements? They would still had these achievements but less people would have recognize them.
A great deal of history as we know it depends entirely on one turning point here and there. If things went a little differently at one or more of these points we would have quit a different history to debate right now. On the other hand many human achievements were possible under different circumstance in different places of the world so much to say that they were inevitable. That is to say if one people failed to accomplish this achievement another would have done sometime later. To conclude this point, there was a great chance to have a different sequence of events i.e. history, but there was a little chance that we wouldn’t make the same scientific, philosophical, and moral achievements.
History is circumstantial, Civilization is inevitable. That is it!
Oh! By the way don’t forget to enjoy the game the way you like. If you miss this or that civ, get a mod pack that includes it. If none has it, request it and there may be someone who would do it for you. Otherwise go learn some modding it is not that hard to add one or more civs. For Israel in particular, it is already in more than one mod pack. Being an Egyptian I let lose my irrational feelings and I enjoyed conquering Israel razing Tel Aviv and keeping Jerusalem!! I was playing ViSa mod pack of course. So people are welcome to play Israel and conquer Egypt or Arabia, it is a game after all.
 
Compared to many others, the hebrews don't deserve a place.
 
'tis mine as well, and from what i can see, the Hebrews are a much better choice than the HRE.


:cry: I don't think anyone thought they were good choice, though the UU ( forgot spelling) looks really cool =]
 
its the Landsknecht. and from what i remember, they were mercenaries in the 1400s-1600s, mainly from Germany.

and actually, if you looked at the polls in the BtS forum, a good number of people thought that the HRE was a good or okay idea.
 
I think the Hebrews/Jews/Israelites/Israelis deserve to be in, even though they were never an empire. They at least deserve to be included more than some of the civs already included in Civ4 and Warlords.
They spread far and wide while still maintaining their own identity. Where are the Babylonians or Romans today? their languages and cultures are dead, and the Jews are still here. The Jews had a long standing impact on religion, culture and science.
It's true that Zoroastrianism couldv'e spread Monotheism around the world, but it didn't. Judaism did. Arguably the most important text in the world, the Bible, was a Hebrew text. Christanity and Islam were deeply influenced by Judaism. I think I heard about 20% of all Nobel Prize winners are Jews.
Not to mention modern Israel has one of the most powerful armies in the world today. Saying that modern Israel has nothing to do with the ancient one is ridiculous. It may not genetically match 100% but the culture and language are identical, and Israel was always the homeland of the Jews.
Hebrew independence in the Holy Land wasn't brief at all. They had on and off independence for about 1000 years, and 200-300 years of continual self-rule. There was also another 100 years of independence after the rebellion against the Seleucid Empire, the Hasmonian Kingdom. And of course there is the modern state as well.

All these are reasons Israel should be included as a civ. But there are many reasons it would be complicated for Firaxis to include them. First of all are the leaders. Leaders from modern Israel are somewhat controversial and too recent. Ancient leaders pose a problem: first of all, David and Solomon aren't really the best documented historical figures. Not to offend anyone but including one of them is like including King Arthur for the English. They very well could have existed, but the details are too sketchy. Besides, they are also religious figures, they are (according to the Bible) ancestors of Jesus and had direct relations with God and prophets. So including them might be too religious for the game, kind of like including Muhammad for the Arabs. The only suitable leaders I can think of are Judah and Simon Macabee, the brothers who fought the Greek and re-established Jewish independence. But they too have some religous context (Chanuka) and didn't really rule a big prosperous empire.
So all in all, they should be in but it might be too complicated for Firaxis to include them. This is a game after all.
 
So all in all, they should be in but it might be too complicated for Firaxis to include them. This is a game after all.

i have no problem with having an (ancient) jewish civilization in the game. they certianly had enough merits to be considered being put into the game, probably after the 1st exapnsion. however, as you said, the matter itself is complicated and contreversial. and Firaxis is here to make us games, not to start heated debates.
 
The territory of the Hebrews wasn't huge, but it wasn't exactly minuscule, either.

Anyway, at the very least, there are a couple of mods that would be a lot of fun:

  • One that emulates the formation of ancient Judah/Israel that starts with the Jews in the wilderness near Sinai with a goal to conquer Canaan to the north
  • One that emulates the current situation in the middle east, including Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia as neutral players, the US and England as more or less Israeli allies, but embroiled in Iraq with too few units, and Iran, Syria, and Lebanon as Israel's enemies. Focus would be on diplomacy, but with "all options on the table," so to speak ;).

They very well could have existed, but the details are too sketchy. Besides, they are also religious figures, they are (according to the Bible) ancestors of Jesus and had direct relations with God and prophets. So including them might be too religious for the game, kind of like including Muhammad for the Arabs.

David was a religious man, but was as close to a secular leader as one could get back in that day and age, when religion wasn't just about spirituality, but also functioned much as the state does today (set laws, prescribed punishment, settled disputes, etc). I mean, do you think Saladin was an atheist or something? And look at Isabel: she twist screws through people's thumbs to get them to convert.

Including Moses as a leader would be more like including Muhammed.

David, Solomon, or Judah Macabee would all work, imo. The only modern leader worth including is probably Ben Gurion, but I think that'd be WAY too controversial.
 
Hrm...the Mayan and Aztec empires weren't really any larger than the territory the Hebrews presided over for a few hundred years

Only real reason to leave the Hebrews out is that the region is already pretty well represented by much larger, more powerful nations that were about as influential in the long term (the influence of Persia, Arabia, and the Ottomans definitely rivals the influence of Judaism and its "offshoot").
 
Hrm...the Mayan and Aztec empires weren't really any larger than the territory the Hebrews presided over for a few hundred years

however, Firaxis still needed representation of the MesoAmerican peoples. the Mayans were ridiculously advanced, the most advanced, in fact, of the MesoAmerican peoples - they excelled in Astronomy, mathematics, architecture, and all that goody civilization crap that the Greeks did; and the Aztecs were quite famous for their killing sprees, which pop culture dictates as interesting.
 
which pop culture dictates as interesting.

lol!

And, yeah, I agree that the lack of Mesoamerican cultures explains why the Maya and Aztec are in (not to mention how amazing particularly Mayan culture was).
 
Back
Top Bottom