Historians discuss: Civ switching (Youtube video)

The_J

Say No 2 Net Validations
Administrator
Supporter
Joined
Oct 22, 2008
Messages
42,121
Location
DE/NL/FR

@Paisley_Trees , history student and civ enthusiast, and one of her colleagues, are discussing the civ switching in a new video.
They discuss in depth how culture involves, that cultures do not vanish, but that we still have aspects from past civilizations with us. This includes the topic from one of the controversial threads/reddit topics, of colonized civilizations potentially being replaced by colonizing civilizations (to note: This has not been shown anywhere, and is purely speculative), which indeed would be inappropriate.
They discuss the historical appropriate choices, and what the logic behind is. They conclude that there is obviously some compromise, between gameplay choices and historical options, and that people need to be more relaxed about these details. They suggest that instead of "historical choice" Firaxis should use "influenced by" or "sphere of influence", to avoid the direct historical tie. Or even taken from @PotatoMcWhiskey "the closest thing we got".

The video is pretty nice. If you're interested in the civ-switching mechanic (and whom are we kidding... everyone here is), then have a look at it.
 
They suggest that instead of "historical choice" Firaxis should use "influenced by" or "sphere of influence", to avoid the direct historical tie.
This is a good suggestion. I like it.
 
An alternative: Complete nonsense. Playing the Teotihuacans let's you unlock Japan in the exploration age because they both think the sun is important. Choosing Confucius as a leader unlocks America because of Big Trouble in Little China Have the criteria for historical influence be so arcane and obtuse that people can't even attempt at taking them seriously. My 2 cents, Firaxis.
 
I don't agree with everything they say in the video but I also agree that there is an issue that didn't need to be because of naming. Just don't claim Egypt into songhai is historical , call it thematic path or whatever
 
I don't agree with everything they say in the video but I also agree that there is an issue that didn't need to be because of naming. Just don't claim Egypt into songhai is historical , call it thematic path or whatever
A better description would be local/geographic…because that’s really all it is. What civ were near or within the borders of this other civ
 
A better description would be local/geographic…because that’s really all it is. What civ were near or within the borders of this other civ
Thematic allow for gameplay links, as with Egypt and songhai have bonus for river, maybe that's why they did this but yeah I am not sure. Funnily enough I have checked and Egypt was geographically closer to the Mongols (Ilkhanate) than to Songhai
 
They both live in the same desert or look the same or something just slap a label on it, ship it, we'll call it Civ7
 
Back
Top Bottom