Howitzer
Chieftain
1) Please make the AI setle more rationaly. In Civ 5 we've seen a civ on an empty great continent of their own, full of resources, build 3 cities in that continent and then go for some stupid remote snow island...
Setllement should be focused on the following criteria:
a) Head for the resources!! Why have 3 happiness when you can have 5?
b) Consider distance from palace! The further away from capital, the more difficult to defend both the capital and the newly founded remote city.
c) Army deployment in case of an enemy invasion: In an empire regardless of size, army deployment would be faster if cities are close to each other than if they were scattered in the 4 corners of the world.
2) Please make the AI dow me for a reallife political, or fiscal reason rather than on emotion.
To explain, instead of loving me badly or hating me because I'm a friend of a friend who's enemy was the cousin of an enemy civ, instead of hating me just because I was denounced,
do it for the following reasons:
1) Do I have nice luxury resources? - if yes I'm in the eye of the tornado
2) Does my army pose a potential threat? - I should be dealt with, before I become one
3) I must not be allowed to aquire oil-aluminum-uranium!
4) Am I a wonder monger? Seriously I should not be allowed to live in peace after the 2nd wonder on my civ
5) Am I a war monger? Yes they all denounce me , they cry but they still watch pathetically waiting for their end as my troops march from Moson Kahni in the heart of Europe. In my homeland there are only workers and ladies, so a sneak attack in my west coast from the Japs, a new Pearl harbor, would at least slow down the European campaign. If the Japs were supported by the Koreans in that attack, I would seriously sweat and maybe had to withdraw some troops back home..And then the Zulus would hit me from my East coast and I would start a new game out of anger and frustration!
And that should be in all LEVELS
PS. other than legacy reasons, I never got it why civ needs to have levels?
In easy, man cheats machine...In hard machine cheats man...In Prince noone cheats anyone, but we all start with 0 happiness
(I think) and stuggle to grow!can we please have a really balanced gameplay where it's pretty easy to get huge, the AI gets huge as well we all discover things fast, and we get to war nicely?
PS2: Wanna have warmongering penalty again in Civ 6??? Apply it to those who burn cities only! You dirty Khan why capture a city just to murder people and burn their homes? You psycho!
Capturing a city for their resources, gold , position etc, is a solid reason for WAR throughout history, and is the reason we all play CIV after all...But capturing just to burn it, you should be prompted to the court of Hague for crimes against humanity!
Setllement should be focused on the following criteria:
a) Head for the resources!! Why have 3 happiness when you can have 5?
b) Consider distance from palace! The further away from capital, the more difficult to defend both the capital and the newly founded remote city.
c) Army deployment in case of an enemy invasion: In an empire regardless of size, army deployment would be faster if cities are close to each other than if they were scattered in the 4 corners of the world.
2) Please make the AI dow me for a reallife political, or fiscal reason rather than on emotion.
To explain, instead of loving me badly or hating me because I'm a friend of a friend who's enemy was the cousin of an enemy civ, instead of hating me just because I was denounced,
do it for the following reasons:
1) Do I have nice luxury resources? - if yes I'm in the eye of the tornado
2) Does my army pose a potential threat? - I should be dealt with, before I become one
3) I must not be allowed to aquire oil-aluminum-uranium!
4) Am I a wonder monger? Seriously I should not be allowed to live in peace after the 2nd wonder on my civ
5) Am I a war monger? Yes they all denounce me , they cry but they still watch pathetically waiting for their end as my troops march from Moson Kahni in the heart of Europe. In my homeland there are only workers and ladies, so a sneak attack in my west coast from the Japs, a new Pearl harbor, would at least slow down the European campaign. If the Japs were supported by the Koreans in that attack, I would seriously sweat and maybe had to withdraw some troops back home..And then the Zulus would hit me from my East coast and I would start a new game out of anger and frustration!
And that should be in all LEVELS
PS. other than legacy reasons, I never got it why civ needs to have levels?
In easy, man cheats machine...In hard machine cheats man...In Prince noone cheats anyone, but we all start with 0 happiness
(I think) and stuggle to grow!can we please have a really balanced gameplay where it's pretty easy to get huge, the AI gets huge as well we all discover things fast, and we get to war nicely?PS2: Wanna have warmongering penalty again in Civ 6??? Apply it to those who burn cities only! You dirty Khan why capture a city just to murder people and burn their homes? You psycho!
Capturing a city for their resources, gold , position etc, is a solid reason for WAR throughout history, and is the reason we all play CIV after all...But capturing just to burn it, you should be prompted to the court of Hague for crimes against humanity!
