There are too few leaders and they don't reflect the historical period. Historical eras are poorly conceived; the end of an era is not the same for every civilization. The Middle Ages in CE is different from the Italian or Japanese one. Artificial intelligence should simulate more, enough with pirate leaders, improve the artificial intelligence and improve the game mechanics.
-
📚 Admin Project Update: I've added a major feature to PictureBooks.io called Avatar Studio! You can now upload photos to instantly turn your kids (and pets! 🐶) into illustrated characters that star in their own stories. Give it a try and let me know what you think!
I think the game should get back to some realistic history
- Thread starter Bast
- Start date
It is necessary to separate leaders from the nation policies change according to eras and leaders who are not immortal and indispensable to create fluidity and historicity to the game
Naokaukodem
Millenary King
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2003
- Messages
- 4,322
Old World has that and honestly I find it... boring. (didn't play much though)
If there is no internal dissent, there can be no change of government, and favoring internal and external events for the change of era, the change of government influences the objectives of the game, internal and foreign relations, and ideologies.
Patine
Deity
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2011
- Messages
- 12,206
The game practically plays itself!
It is a serious mistake to underestimate politics and ideology and politics as an economy as well as the absence of an internal opposition that modifies the ideology and revolutions in the empire with a buana artificial intelligence the possibilities of choice and very large, this should do to the fira fir
For example, if I win a war against Napoleon, why do I still have to have him in the government of France? Can I ask to be replaced with a government that I find better? Or a vassal government?
Last edited:
