If you girlfriend weighed 200... (with poll)

If your lady suddenly was 200 pounds would you still sleep with her?

  • Yes I would, just as frequently

    Votes: 28 31.1%

  • Yes I would, but less often

    Votes: 11 12.2%

  • Yes, but only once, just for the novelty

    Votes: 2 2.2%

  • No, but I would stay with her for the year

    Votes: 8 8.9%

  • No, and I would leave her

    Votes: 29 32.2%

  • Other (please explain!)

    Votes: 12 13.3%
  • Total voters
    90
Status
Not open for further replies.
Narz

Narz

keeping it real
Joined
Jun 1, 2002
Messages
31,514
Location
Haverhill, UK
...pounds would you still sleep with? Substitute wife for GF is you like.

Let's assume she could lose the 50-100 pounds (depending on height and body type) necessary to get back to a more attractive weight but it would take 1 year.

Obviously if you dig fat chicks this question is a no-brainer.

This ought to be interesting. :D:

- Narz :king:
 
Other: depends on the girl. Ive known some women who were just so damned sexy, personality wise, that it didnt matter how fat they were.
 
As I said in the other thread if a girl weighs 200 pounds it's likely due to some major character flaws or self apathy, things I do not want to deal with.
 
I just have preferences for Skinny Athletic build to plump build. I dont like large and ultra fat women :ack:.
 
Fetus4188 said:
As I said in the other thread if a girl weighs 200 pounds it's likely due to some major character flaws or self apathy, things I do not want to deal with.
Click to expand...

I disagree with this; if she is willing to act towards losing weight, it is not self apathy.

My line of though on this is that if I have selected somebody as a consort, there is something very very right with them, and that keeping them in your possession until such time as they lose the excessive weight and can be activated is worthwhile.
 
Yes, but I would ask her to do something about it.
80 - 90 kgs or less is acceptable for me.

And if she's unable to do that, ok then we get another situation ...
 
200 pounds is the perfect weight for a 5'8" woman. Adjust for height appropriately, and you've got a real woman.

Real women have curves.
 
If we're just talking girlfriend, and considering my age, I most likely would end the relationship if she got real fat; Now if I really loved her, I wouldn't, but if it is just an average girlfriend there is no way I'd date her if she got fat. 150 is definitely pushing it. I've only seen one attractive girl ever that was close to 150. Physical attraction is a huge part of a relationship, and I can't make myself be attracted to a fat person.
 
200 lbs may be pushing the envelope but I like larger women, skinny model types don't do it for me. Curves are the essence of womanly beauty, 130 to 150 is probably my physical ideal and seems to be a pattern that repeats itself (granted, I am talking about full grown women and not teen-agers - in my case it would just be disgusting and/or illegal otherwise). Actually if you wanted to find out whether I was a superficial pig who judged women by their body the best question to ask would be whether I would still sleep with her as much if she was less than 125 lbs. I would like to say that the answer was yes and personality was more important than body type but history points in the other direction. It is written into our genes I suspect. Personally I prefer women who have never had their ego stoked by thousands of libidenous adolescents staring at them wantonly and as a result learned social pathologies that get in the way of them being normal people. It doesn't happen to all "beautiful" women but it is not uncommon.
 
No . . . would I sleep with a women period . . . likely not . . .

In reality, weight is but a number. It depends really on how the weight is carried. Being gay, i really have no interest in women, but, if I did, weight would be the least of my concerns. I would look at whats inside, not at whats outside. I don't see how an anemic peroxide blonde with unaturally large breasts is "attractive", for any male.
 
When it comes down to it I guess I prefer women who feel free to be themselves and are not bound up by mainstream social outlooks, looks are less important but not entirely unimportant; I like crazy, independent, creative individualists with personality and more to go on than just physical attraction.
 
I am revulsed by fat. Not talking about some good amount of flesh where it's needed, to give good womanly features. I can even stand a bit too much of it. But only a bit.
So well, if it happened suddendly and could be resolved in the year, I would probably stay with her (if I'm with her, it's because I love her, right ?), but I doubt that 50 Kg of turn-off would allow me to do anything in bed.
 
I once had a girlfriend who was about that weight, but was 1.85m, abit fleshy but I like my women BIG. She was abit taller than me as well.
 
I would not sleep with an elephant. This is by far too much to tolerate.

If you love a little overweight person who suddenly becomes a whale, you will help her to get back to a decent size, but if this does not happen, love will probably die.
 
I wonder if this issue is an ill-defined cockpit of difference between the two sides of the Atlantic. Last time I was on the Continent most of the younger women struck me as being far too skinny to be attractive and perhaps borderline anorexic....
 
I don't know. Clearly, I'd be more likely to stick with her if she was 1.85m than if 1.55m. Would depend on the rest of the relationship too, of course.

FearlessLeader2 said:
200 pounds is the perfect weight for a 5'8" woman. Adjust for height appropriately, and you've got a real woman.

Real women have curves.
Click to expand...
Alot of them, ap'rently - that works out at a BMI of just over 30.

I my tastes run into much thinner women. And it would feel weird to have a gf who weighed much more than me.
 
FearlessLeader2 said:
200 pounds is the perfect weight for a 5'8" woman. Adjust for height appropriately, and you've got a real woman.
Click to expand...
Wow...

I'm a man, 1,75 m (it's about 5'9'' if I'm not wrong), well built, and I weight only two thirds of that.

A woman is supposed to weight less than a man, and fat weight less than muscles.

So 100 Kg for a 1,72 m woman isn't "with curves", it's including entire hillsides.
 
Well well well... look at all these hardcore lefties now.

Terrorists have rights, it's bad to kill murderous scum and rapists, and iraq was a paradise before we got there... but fat girls? noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

:lol:

Moderator Action: Warned for threadjacking and trolling
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
 
Bronx Warlord said:
Well well well... look at all these hardcore lefties now.

Terrorists have rights, it's bad to kill murderous scum and rapists, and iraq was a paradise before we got there... but fat girls? noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

:lol:
Click to expand...
:hmm:

Except threadjacking with idiotic political comments, what does this post has as a point ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Narz
  • Locked
If you girlfriend weighed 200... (replaced, please close)
Replies
15
Views
716
Narz
Narz
A
Realistic Settings: Take Two
Replies
13
Views
2K
TrailblazingScot
TrailblazingScot
Back
Top Bottom