is it just me??

Vietcong

Deity
Joined
May 29, 2003
Messages
2,570
Location
Texas
is it just me or dose any one eals have mixed fillings about civ 4?? its looking more and more like an rts... i realy like the civ 3 format of city screens ect..
the rts format.. all that... i donno... i just dont think it has that fill it had...

and any words on uu?!!?

whats ur fillings?
 
I don't think I can get upset about looking like an RTS. I might be upset if it played like an RTS, though.

I think we need more information. :)
 
I guess the only thing we can do is wait and see..
 
Yes, but even a turn-based game can PLAY like an RTS game-depending on the kinds of concepts and gameplay options you have to deal with. By the same token, I have had RTS games which play like a TBS game (War of the Worlds comes to mind!!)

Yours,
Aussie_Lurker.
 
I am very very upset. I hate what this game has come to look like, even though I am a fanatic of the Civ series, I will not buy CivIV because it is a traitor to what Civ always meant for me, realistic simulation of world conquest.. and now it looks like a cartoonish ugly game that is just too ugly to play.
 
Okay, we get the picture dude, no need to post about how much you hate the game in every thread in the forum.
 
Vael said:
Okay, we get the picture dude, no need to post about how much you hate the game in every thread in the forum.

You talking to Mobilize or Vietcong? Just curious.


@ Assuie_lurker. By play like a RTS, I meant playing real time ala Age of Empires.

@ Mobilize. Civ has never been a realistic simulation of world conquest. At least as far as I am concerned.
 
He was talking to Mobilize, as he seems to try and threadjack a number of different threads to air his 'grievances'. :rolleyes:

Yours,
Aussie_Lurker.
 
Mobilize said:
I am very very upset. I hate what this game has come to look like, even though I am a fanatic of the Civ series, I will not buy CivIV because it is a traitor to what Civ always meant for me, realistic simulation of world conquest.. and now it looks like a cartoonish ugly game that is just too ugly to play.
since when has Civ ever been "realistic"?

where are the literally thousands of small tribes waiting to be amalgamated into a cohesive nation?
Since when does any leader last more than about 75years (rough guess as to upper limit of life of a monarch) - and so the focus of plan stayed the same throughout history? I mean, Britain 2,000 years ago was a bunch of warring tribes - 1,500 years ago we were fending off angles and vikings - 1,000 years ago we were taken over by a frenchman - 500 years ago we set out to rule the world - now we just kiss the butt of someone who, 250 years ago, would not have any rights within the Empire (talking about Bush, who would have been a colonist).

If you want realism - go outside... the sunshine and fresh air are better for you. If you want to play a game, then load up Civ.
 
Back
Top Bottom