Least favorite civilization (for opponents)

ghostbuster said:
I think theres already bin several posts identical or similar to this one mate.

Wait untile you've been around as long as I have ghostbuster, every question out here has been posted before. It's rare when I see any new questions posted out here, unless it's a thread like "Who would win the battle, a mean little kid with a sling shot, or an M1 Abhrams Tank" :lol:
 
Persia in general, but Babylon is personal. :mad: I once had a space race victory snatched away by one turn because of their stupid culture. :cry:

Persia is just too good. (And they actually build factories)
 
Babylonia...huge culture and always extraordinarily rich.

This civ has always been the most dangerous that I've found in terms of getting on and actually winning a game.
 
I despise getting a start next to the Aztecs.. I am also not fond of getting a start next to the greeks, only because they take more time to "wipe out" then I like and attacking them sends them to a Golden Era.. I am also not fond of playing against America and other expansion civs as that enevitably leads to an early war before I really want to (I prefer starting a campaign with a minimum of 10 horseman, five spearmen, 5 catapults, two settlers and two workers or the equivalent) And I usually send my campaign towards resource goals or consilidating territory goals to avoid two or three front ground wars..
 
ssvensson said:
Nuclear weapons!! MY words are backed with spearmen - Fortified spearmen!!
Thanks a lot! I just took a big swig of Pepsi right before I read your sig. Now I've got Pepsi and snot all over my keyboard! :lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom