Long Term City Placement - Term 3

[GenMarshall]

Yea, we can never advoid the Great Settler Debates.

"I want a Citizen here" -Citizen A

"No I want the city on B" -Citizen B

"I dont care were the city goes" -Citizen Abstain

*Citizen C just walked in and notices a knockout-dragout fight between Citizen A & B

 

[Chieftess]

Maybe I should just number the tiles again...

 

[Octavian X]

*Octavian is beginng to dread the upcoming TC...

Eklektikos, all I ask is that you give some definite instructions this time round...

 

[Eklektikos]

Poll Question: Do you accept the proposal detailed in the first post?

Poll Options:
Yes
No
Abstain

First Post

Proposal:

We place our cities on the sites indicated by this map:

Relevant discussion may be found in this thread.

This poll will run for 48 hours or until quorum is met, whichever is the later.

 

[disorganizer]

hmm. some of the proposed spots have a spacing of 1 (see far up in the north). also doesnt placing a city on a happiness-resource delete the resource? (see north of striders haven)

 

[Eklektikos]

Placing a city on a lux/resource tile does not delete the resource - that is a myth.

The cities in the tundra zone are packed so closely because we can never hope to squeeze more than 1 food per tile from their surrounding terrain. Greater spacing would result in many tiles not being worked.

 

[disorganizer]

so why have so many cities up there anyways? anything we really need up there?
but ok anyways.

 

[Eklektikos]

I do not see those tundra cities as being a super high priority, but those sites are there in case we do find our expansion stalled in other directions for a while. That area would also serve well as a culture farm if temples and libraries were placed in each of those cities, but again it's really just there for the sake of completeness at the moment.