Thank you![]()
It's solid, except that a radical sign cannot be in a denominator.
Huh. I have a grad-school degree in math (from, damn, nearly ten years ago) and that's news to me. Maybe a regional/style thing?
fractions are rational. if there is a radical on the bottom, it's no longer rational. that's they can't be on the bottom.![]()
No problem. I do this for a living.
I think that it's just easier to work with rational denominators, so students are taught to avoid radicals in the denominator. Besides, if one is "stuck", rationalizing the denominator can make things much clearer.Huh. I have a grad-school degree in math (from, damn, nearly ten years ago) and that's news to me. Maybe a regional/style thing?
Ah, not exactly. Fractions certainly don't have to be rational (if you take math at higher levels you'll be knee deep in counterexamples) and square roots/radicals can be rational numbers (though in that case you'll usually simplify them so the radical symbol goes away).
Though you're on to something when you connect fractions with the concept of rational numbers. The actual definition of a rational number is any number which can be written as a fraction a/b where both a and b are integers (and b is not zero).
Do you teach Algebra?
I haven't rationalized a denominator in quite some time... at least, not that I can remember. A lot of people, even math professors I've run into, don't seem to mind if you leave a radical in the denominator.
Huh. I have a grad-school degree in math (from, damn, nearly ten years ago) and that's news to me. Maybe a regional/style thing?