Math Test, Please Help

uhh, I don't get what u guys are saying :(

Can one of you show me how to do it in MS paint?
 
math.JPG
 
Thank you :goodjob:
 
Huh. I have a grad-school degree in math (from, damn, nearly ten years ago) and that's news to me. Maybe a regional/style thing?

I don't know; I learned it in fifth grade in Massachusetts. Hasn't really come up since.
 
fractions are rational. if there is a radical on the bottom, it's no longer rational. that's they can't be on the bottom. :yup:
 
fractions are rational. if there is a radical on the bottom, it's no longer rational. that's they can't be on the bottom. :yup:

Ah, not exactly. Fractions certainly don't have to be rational (if you take math at higher levels you'll be knee deep in counterexamples) and square roots/radicals can be rational numbers (though in that case you'll usually simplify them so the radical symbol goes away).

Though you're on to something when you connect fractions with the concept of rational numbers. The actual definition of a rational number is any number which can be written as a fraction a/b where both a and b are integers (and b is not zero).
 
Huh. I have a grad-school degree in math (from, damn, nearly ten years ago) and that's news to me. Maybe a regional/style thing?
I think that it's just easier to work with rational denominators, so students are taught to avoid radicals in the denominator. Besides, if one is "stuck", rationalizing the denominator can make things much clearer.
 
Ah, not exactly. Fractions certainly don't have to be rational (if you take math at higher levels you'll be knee deep in counterexamples) and square roots/radicals can be rational numbers (though in that case you'll usually simplify them so the radical symbol goes away).

Though you're on to something when you connect fractions with the concept of rational numbers. The actual definition of a rational number is any number which can be written as a fraction a/b where both a and b are integers (and b is not zero).

they do so have to be rational! it's just the laws of math :shake:
i get higher levels of math next year :love:
 
I haven't rationalized a denominator in quite some time... at least, not that I can remember. A lot of people, even math professors I've run into, don't seem to mind if you leave a radical in the denominator.
 
I haven't rationalized a denominator in quite some time... at least, not that I can remember. A lot of people, even math professors I've run into, don't seem to mind if you leave a radical in the denominator.

It's just the high school teachers who care about such things. They have tons of silly rules they can't justify. Usually people in universities are much more liberal in their presentation. Actually, my first thought when I saw the question was "What am I supposed to do?". If I did some calculations and arrived to a conclusion sqrt5 +1/sqrt5, I would be completely satisfied with it.

Maybe the reason behind this particular silly rule is that as 6/sqrt5 is just a fraction, expression (6sqrt5)/5 can be understood as some mulitiple of 1/5, and hence it's quantity is more obvious.
 
do your own work you lazy little punk! what happens when you get into the exams and cant do it hey?!
 
Huh. I have a grad-school degree in math (from, damn, nearly ten years ago) and that's news to me. Maybe a regional/style thing?

Well, here we call this rationalizing (rationalizare) and if you completed an exercise, no matter how complicated it is, and you leave that in the denominator, it will be considered like you did not finish the exercise. :crazyeye:
 
Back
Top Bottom