Message to Firaxis
- Thread starter TETurkhan
- Start date
Well, I actually meant start a new thread in the Civ3 PBEM and MP section. As I doubt people are going to come to, 'Message to Firaxis' to post there MP name
.Laser guided
Warlord
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2002
- Messages
- 188
The more Civs you add the less unique all the Civs become, you begin to have overlap in Civ-traits and UU. In my opinion Civ is to a point now where they need to think of adding more Civ-traits or some kind of secondary level of ability to Civ3's replacer. Otherwise adding a new Civ just because they existed is no justification for game inclusion.
Many cultures/civilizations/countries just don't deserve to be placed in Vanilla-Civ; for them create your mods. I want to play a Civ that had to be crushed by a stronger Civ or that fell apart because it was just too big for its own good. I want to play a Civ that in its time could've conquered the world or almost did or at least was threatened the big kid on the block.
The Mayans (definitely a Great Civilization but...) disappeared! Where the hell are they? Don't include them!!!
Sorry Civ-Bubbas, but it seems to me that the Aztecs represent not only themselves but quite possibly the Incas. No Civ for them NEXT!!!
The Polynesians! Yeah right! I'm sure they were only steps away from conquering the world! Hell!!! Pinky and the Brain got closer!
The Israelites? PUH-LEEEEZE!!! They wandered around the Middle East for most of their history, not to mention their Egypt situation. Then it took the creation of the UN to give them a permanent piece of land under their feet and even that is shaky! Where's the great dynasty!
Canada?!?! You mean that's a real place? You gotta be kidding me and yourselves right? You really are just kidding right?? You include Canada you might as well include Australia.
Come on guys let's get real with some of these choices to include in V-Civ, because I'm one of the least talented in creating Mods and all that jazz so I don't want any weak CANDY-A**ED Civs in the V-Civ. If they don't exist make'em your mods and be done with it.
Debate needs to be on improving gameplay. How can we make gameplay more realistic? How can replayability be improved so that Civ is fun everytime we load it up?
Many cultures/civilizations/countries just don't deserve to be placed in Vanilla-Civ; for them create your mods. I want to play a Civ that had to be crushed by a stronger Civ or that fell apart because it was just too big for its own good. I want to play a Civ that in its time could've conquered the world or almost did or at least was threatened the big kid on the block.
The Mayans (definitely a Great Civilization but...) disappeared! Where the hell are they? Don't include them!!!
Sorry Civ-Bubbas, but it seems to me that the Aztecs represent not only themselves but quite possibly the Incas. No Civ for them NEXT!!!
The Polynesians! Yeah right! I'm sure they were only steps away from conquering the world! Hell!!! Pinky and the Brain got closer!
The Israelites? PUH-LEEEEZE!!! They wandered around the Middle East for most of their history, not to mention their Egypt situation. Then it took the creation of the UN to give them a permanent piece of land under their feet and even that is shaky! Where's the great dynasty!
Canada?!?! You mean that's a real place? You gotta be kidding me and yourselves right? You really are just kidding right?? You include Canada you might as well include Australia.
Come on guys let's get real with some of these choices to include in V-Civ, because I'm one of the least talented in creating Mods and all that jazz so I don't want any weak CANDY-A**ED Civs in the V-Civ. If they don't exist make'em your mods and be done with it.
Debate needs to be on improving gameplay. How can we make gameplay more realistic? How can replayability be improved so that Civ is fun everytime we load it up?
Similar threads
