A Mistform attacked a Scout defending four Workers.
The Scout managed to flee combat, yet the four Workers were removed from the map anyway.
Uh, what?
I was expecting the Mistform to kill the Scout (as it had killed the Axeman on the previous turn), and thus killing the four Workers. BUT, if the Scout manages to withdraw from combat, shouldn't the Workers then be preserved?
Secondly, since the Scout is a Recon unit, shouldn't it be able to see the Mistform to begin with?
I can accept that a Scout might not be able to, but a Hunter can, but I'm 11 turns off from Hunting on this particular build, and X number of turns from a Hunting Lodge and thus a Hunter.
However, as Mistforms seem to be operating under the same principles as a Giant Spider et al, a Scout *should* be able to see them. Whether any accompanying units on the stack would be effective against them, I've no particular qualms; said Mistform could theoretically defeat Auric Ulvin just from being ethereal for all I care so long as a Scout can see it (ok, that's a bit imbalanced but I think my point is clear).
The Scout managed to flee combat, yet the four Workers were removed from the map anyway.
Uh, what?
I was expecting the Mistform to kill the Scout (as it had killed the Axeman on the previous turn), and thus killing the four Workers. BUT, if the Scout manages to withdraw from combat, shouldn't the Workers then be preserved?
Secondly, since the Scout is a Recon unit, shouldn't it be able to see the Mistform to begin with?
I can accept that a Scout might not be able to, but a Hunter can, but I'm 11 turns off from Hunting on this particular build, and X number of turns from a Hunting Lodge and thus a Hunter.
However, as Mistforms seem to be operating under the same principles as a Giant Spider et al, a Scout *should* be able to see them. Whether any accompanying units on the stack would be effective against them, I've no particular qualms; said Mistform could theoretically defeat Auric Ulvin just from being ethereal for all I care so long as a Scout can see it (ok, that's a bit imbalanced but I think my point is clear).