SeleucusNicator
Diadoch
Most of the wars in the past have had names. Some were rather creative, some were boring, but they were there. They may have had to do with how long the war was (Thirty Year's War, Six-Day War), when they occured (War of 1812, Yom Kippur War), what they were over (Opium Wars, War of the Spanish Succession) or simply who fought who (Mexican-American War, Franco-Spanish wars).
In the 20th Century, we got slightly boring with World War I and World War II, but then we got a nifty little term in "The Cold War." Even "Operation Desert Storm" was cool. (Although I still call that The Gulf War)
However, in the 21st century, with traditional warfare rapidly disapearing, and apparently so is our ability to name wars. What do we call the last two "conflicts"? Quite blandly, they're "The war in Afghanistan" and "The War in Iraq."
For Afghanistan that may work, but we've had a "war in Iraq" before. I think that name, although it is beloved of the media right now, is unacceptably vague. Right now, it's fine, but I don't consider it historically acceptable. From a non-American viewpoint, "The War in Afghanistan" is also far too vague; the Russians fought there less than three decades ago.
What do you call the current conflict in Iraq? I have said "the war in Iraq" or "the current situation in Iraq" or simply "Iraq" many times on these forums, but when I formally refer to it, I use "Gulf War II".
What say you?
In the 20th Century, we got slightly boring with World War I and World War II, but then we got a nifty little term in "The Cold War." Even "Operation Desert Storm" was cool. (Although I still call that The Gulf War)
However, in the 21st century, with traditional warfare rapidly disapearing, and apparently so is our ability to name wars. What do we call the last two "conflicts"? Quite blandly, they're "The war in Afghanistan" and "The War in Iraq."
For Afghanistan that may work, but we've had a "war in Iraq" before. I think that name, although it is beloved of the media right now, is unacceptably vague. Right now, it's fine, but I don't consider it historically acceptable. From a non-American viewpoint, "The War in Afghanistan" is also far too vague; the Russians fought there less than three decades ago.
What do you call the current conflict in Iraq? I have said "the war in Iraq" or "the current situation in Iraq" or simply "Iraq" many times on these forums, but when I formally refer to it, I use "Gulf War II".
What say you?