I used to play Civ II a fair amount, though with 4 kids, I never did have the time to be really good at it. I also had a fairly slow machine, so later stages of the game got to be REALLY slow.
Anyhoo, I have a new 17" PowerBook (first new computer in 7 years!) now and of course had to have Civ 3 with it. I downloaded the 1.21g patch prior to playing my first game.
Even though I am playing on the easiest level, I am getting ####-hammered by the AI and that ain't no joke. As soon as the other Civs discover each other, they declare war against me and all I end up doing is defending my 4-6 cities (thank god for granary or I wouldn't be lasting as long as I am) against as many as 4 other Civs, who either won't talk to me, want more money to settle up than I have (and the treacherous retches will only redeclare war in a few turns anyway, or so it has been so far) or are friendly for a few turns, get annoyed quite quickly and then declare war. I haven't so much "lost" as lost interest in these games as clearly they end up going nowhere. I can defend the cities against what they send, but can't really grow, search the map or really do anything but defend my cities ad nauseum. Considering that I'm not crossing anyone's borders, I'm lost as to how I am losing the attitude war so quickly, especially on the easiest setting.
So, what am I doing wrong? Do I need to build my cities closer together? Should I be building fortresses? I guess I am just at a loss. On such an easy level, it shouldn't be this much work. I'm not a completely inexperienced player, but this almost feels like I've come across either a bug in the game setup (I prefer Pangea as I was never a seafaring adventuring type) or else certain of combos of opponents in the default can really pose problems (i.e. the Romans have proven to ALWAYS break treaties, declare war and effectively will lay seige to whichever town is closest to their empire. I understand the whole "militaristic" aspect of things, but to that degree on the easiest setting? Is Civ III really that much harder than Civ II?
Anyhoo, I have a new 17" PowerBook (first new computer in 7 years!) now and of course had to have Civ 3 with it. I downloaded the 1.21g patch prior to playing my first game.
Even though I am playing on the easiest level, I am getting ####-hammered by the AI and that ain't no joke. As soon as the other Civs discover each other, they declare war against me and all I end up doing is defending my 4-6 cities (thank god for granary or I wouldn't be lasting as long as I am) against as many as 4 other Civs, who either won't talk to me, want more money to settle up than I have (and the treacherous retches will only redeclare war in a few turns anyway, or so it has been so far) or are friendly for a few turns, get annoyed quite quickly and then declare war. I haven't so much "lost" as lost interest in these games as clearly they end up going nowhere. I can defend the cities against what they send, but can't really grow, search the map or really do anything but defend my cities ad nauseum. Considering that I'm not crossing anyone's borders, I'm lost as to how I am losing the attitude war so quickly, especially on the easiest setting.
So, what am I doing wrong? Do I need to build my cities closer together? Should I be building fortresses? I guess I am just at a loss. On such an easy level, it shouldn't be this much work. I'm not a completely inexperienced player, but this almost feels like I've come across either a bug in the game setup (I prefer Pangea as I was never a seafaring adventuring type) or else certain of combos of opponents in the default can really pose problems (i.e. the Romans have proven to ALWAYS break treaties, declare war and effectively will lay seige to whichever town is closest to their empire. I understand the whole "militaristic" aspect of things, but to that degree on the easiest setting? Is Civ III really that much harder than Civ II?