New UUs

[mac224]

This is probably an old complaint but the UUs suck. Too many of them occur too early and/or too late to make it interesting in the industrial/modern era. So change the following:

American: B-29 bomber (10/8/3) in place of Bomber. This would pit the American UU approx same time as German UU.

Russian: Heavy Artillery (14/2/2) in place of Artillery. Too damn many horsemen UUs to suit me.

Then you might see Germany, America, and Russia all in their GAs at once, each with truly useful units.

mac

 

[thestonesfan]

The Cossack isn't a good UU?

 

[mac224]

It's a fine UU, if you want yet another horse-based one.

The Cossack isn't a good UU?

 

[Batho]

Multiple UU for each civ.

Batho

 

[AKtionFich]

1 uu for each age
or maybe two

there are serval ideas to individulize units ingernerally, would be nice too.

 

[mitsho]

NO, not more uu's, but ok, make them more diverse and better by

EITHER make the civs different, give some two uu's, perhaps one civ even three, but some can stay by one. Otherways, we just get to see only uu's....

OR let every civ have one uu, but create some wonders that give you acces to a unique unit (this way you can distribute the uu's even on the ages etc and still have the civs equal strong).

mfG mitsho