mazzz
Emperor
you should be able to occupy and set up a new goverment in a conqured city
occupy
- Thread starter mazzz
- Start date
mazzz
Emperor
no, if you conquer a city, it is now part of your empire, lets say you done want to keep the cities you took you could set up a new goverment. So if you were a democracy, you could conquer an enemy and change their goverment, and make them friendly toward your civ
phorvath2110
Upgradable to Cav
mazzz said:
This would be really useful in areas where there are minorities left over from a now defunct civ. Let's say the French wipe out the Aztecs, you can conquer the Aztec lands and then only occupy them and set up a friendly aztec government.
sealman
Hater of Babylonians
what is the point in adding a new rival in mid game?
phorvath2110
Upgradable to Cav
sealman said:
It would be an ally/satellite and help you against your opponent.
mazzz
Emperor
The US and UK did not keep France after WW2
sealman
Hater of Babylonians
phorvath2110 said:
It would also help you against an opponent if it stayed with your empire. plus, you do not have to worry about recapturing it when the ally turns on you.
Red Ant said:
I personally don't see how adding a new rival into the game in mid game is any fun, it just means that I have to watch my back and prepare to take him out once he turns on my.
I don't even want to go into reality here.
phorvath2110
Upgradable to Cav
sealman said:
I'm not sure if it was Alpha Centauri or Civ that once your opponent surrenders to you they cannot turn on you. If that type of clause was put in, then you wouldn't have to worry about it
phorvath2110
Upgradable to Cav
mazzz said:
True, but the USSR did "keep" Poland, Hungary, East Germany, etc... (even though they were still considered independent nations.
sealman
Hater of Babylonians
phorvath2110 said:I'm not sure if it was Alpha Centauri or Civ that once your opponent surrenders to you they cannot turn on you. If that type of clause was put in, then you wouldn't have to worry about it
but still, the cons (ie. the AI helping you) still outwiegh the pros (ie. you controlling the city). So I don't think I would ever create one of these ally states.
I just don't see the point.
Well, I personally like the realism this would add. As it was said, UK and US didn't keep France after WWII, perhaps, you're playing online, and your BUDDY loses his land. You can go in, and reconquer for him, or something.
This would also go in well with my idea, to allow movement through allied cities/occupied squares.
This would also go in well with my idea, to allow movement through allied cities/occupied squares.
