RalofTyr
King
You're incredibly witty. But I've given reasons for my view, and you haven't given any for yours.
You're too kind. I'm really an idiot.
There was never a point in time when English was around in Britain that Latin was the primary language.
Not true, Latin is still the primary dead-language of the Catholic Church, which is presently used in England.
When you're talking about timeframes stretching centuries, putting a label on the language spoken like "English" or "French" or "Arabic" is silly. There is no "English". It doesn't exist as a single entity. What we do have is a unfathomable series of dialects which share some common vocaublary and grammar but differ from each other very much in many ways.
Language is affected by so many things: Geography, Social class, Time period (Chaucer's english is VERY different from the English of Beowolf), and even a person's mother tongue affects the English you know and speak.
English won't be replaced by any other language, ever. It will absorb and adopt features of other languages it comes in contact with and evolve and change, but it can't be replaced.
You never know what circumstances will be in the future. In the case of native Americans, they're language was replaced, due to deaths...of all who spoke it.
To wonder if English will be replace entired by a new language...it would be foolish to rule that out...and equally foolish to think it will happen.
It is true languages evolve and change with time. If man should build generation ships to go across the stars, would they lose the word for "Rain"?