Ciceronian
Latin Scholar
I did the timed 12 minute test there and got 138.
Perfection said:I took it a while ago and got 15something, completly meaningless.
Okay, here's my reasoning:Ciceronian said:How the jack did you figure that out?OK, the first puzzle shows some similarities between the single shapes, but the second one just seems to to show some random shapes: What's the square doing there, surrounded by all sorts of weird things? I just can't see any logical pattern.
It could be #4.Lord Parkin said:The first one: 2. (I'm fairly sure on that one.)
The first one both 2 & 4 look the best, 4 being the better answer - as it plays a part in a larger pattern than 2 does.Lord Parkin said:Okay, here's my reasoning:
- On the first question, the number of black dots and their positioning in the 3x3 grid makes option 2 the only sensible choice.
- On the second question, well, that's a little harder to explain. Suffice it to say that I was going by the positions of circles and semi-circles, and the consecutive nature of the changes. But actually, looking at it again, option 5 might be another choice. It all depends on how you view the puzzle. The stupid thing is, you could arguably give reasons why ANY of those five choices should be in the blank square (though I think that 3 and 4 are less likely to fit).![]()
This is an excellent online test, and truely the only one I would give reasonable credit to - simply on the type of questions asked, and methods used. True IQ is best reflected in finding patterns in abstract ways. This site had some very hard questions - not like the simple questions most online tests offer.Elrohir said:The International High IQ society has better tests. They are harder there though, I only got a 120 there. (100 being the average)