joethreeblah
King
-1 You brought in a war ally against us
-1 You negotiated a trade embargo against us
Why don't I know when one of these things happens to me? I should.
************
Also, in order to justify the modifiers for sharing or not sharing the same religion with someone, there needs to be a benefit... so that a human player would also feel the same way, and it isn't so artificial. AI CIV's now sabatage their analysis of the pros and cons of a relationship with baseless feelings.
I would suggest something like:
1) Maybe x2 income from trade routes with foreign civs with same state religion
2) x 0.5 income from trade routes with foreign civs with different state religion
3) Extra Unhappy faces in cities = ([% of world population with a state religion of different state religion] -50 / 10)
50% = 0
51% = 1
61% = 2
90% = 4 "We need to save the world!"
4) +1 happy in cities for trading with civs of same state religion
5) +1 sad in cities for trading with civs of different state religion
This way, you will have the same feelings toward civs of same religion as AI NOW does in a fake manner that makes no sense. Why go to war and cut off trade with a CIV because they are of a different religion, if it otherwise would be to your benefit? This is a losing strategy!
Blocks would form in human games similar to how they do with the AI, and a "mixed" game of AI and human would no longer be complete nonsense, insofar as religion is concerned.
****
"Choosing your civics wisely" should also have some kind of actual benefit to the CIV who cares, in order for it to justify an alteration to the relationship analysis of a forign civ.
-1 You negotiated a trade embargo against us
Why don't I know when one of these things happens to me? I should.
************
Also, in order to justify the modifiers for sharing or not sharing the same religion with someone, there needs to be a benefit... so that a human player would also feel the same way, and it isn't so artificial. AI CIV's now sabatage their analysis of the pros and cons of a relationship with baseless feelings.
I would suggest something like:
1) Maybe x2 income from trade routes with foreign civs with same state religion
2) x 0.5 income from trade routes with foreign civs with different state religion
3) Extra Unhappy faces in cities = ([% of world population with a state religion of different state religion] -50 / 10)
50% = 0
51% = 1
61% = 2
90% = 4 "We need to save the world!"
4) +1 happy in cities for trading with civs of same state religion
5) +1 sad in cities for trading with civs of different state religion
This way, you will have the same feelings toward civs of same religion as AI NOW does in a fake manner that makes no sense. Why go to war and cut off trade with a CIV because they are of a different religion, if it otherwise would be to your benefit? This is a losing strategy!
Blocks would form in human games similar to how they do with the AI, and a "mixed" game of AI and human would no longer be complete nonsense, insofar as religion is concerned.
****
"Choosing your civics wisely" should also have some kind of actual benefit to the CIV who cares, in order for it to justify an alteration to the relationship analysis of a forign civ.
