I think it's a good idea. But God knows the AI is at enough of a disadvantage already. Still, this is a perfectly sound strategy and should be available.
There is no real benefit to have a monopoly on a certain resource, with the exception of denying it to another civ, which could be a benefit which means I just went around in a circle.
I don't think this would be a good idea unless the AI is able to comprehend the pros and cons.
Since very few players, actually trade their strategic resources to the AI (this is an assumption on my part based on what I have read through the threads on this site), this idea would really only benefit the player at the expense of the AI and thus have an unbalancing effect on the game.
Perhaps if the chance of a resource running out were in some way tied to how MUCH of that resource you had, then there would be another more important reason to obtain the resource even if you have a deposit of it (gee, now where have I heard THIS before? ) This would mean that large nations which might be stretching their existing resource to their limit, might seek out fresh deposits of the resource via trade! Just a thought!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.