Not even the emails? If not, I'd try asking Steam to email you your receipts again. It's not like they can't work out what they have sold to you, and when!
There's actually a purchase history somewhere under one of the account menus that lists everything you've bought from/activated on Steam. It's been a while since I looked at it, so I don't remember exactly where it is, but I'm sure its not too hard to find if you go poking around the settings.
I wouldn't count on that. However, I admit that I haven't read the steam contracts. In the case of iTunes/AppStore or Amazon for example you can't download anything again if they ever go out of business and you are not allowed to get it from other platforms. That's also with steam right now: owning something on steam doesn't mean you own any other version of the game, like for example the AppStore or GoG. You have to buy it again if you want to use another version.
If Steam simply disappeared, the publishers would have to make arrangements for those who bought the game through Steam to regain access, and if the publisher has disappeared or doesn't care, yes, you've lost the game. But Steam's millions of users would be a very valuable asset. Most likely if they got in financial trouble, they could sell the accounts with the game access rights; users would just have to agree to work with the new owner to get access again.
I'm at 396 right now, I'm quickly catching up to my Civ5 total (677)
As for Steam going out of business, it's not something I worry about. It's just too damn convenient not to use. The only way you can really lose your games is if we lost the internet completely, like for a long period of time. And I don't even think the best hackers can accomplish this even if they all teamed up.
Of course a Carrington event can send us all back to the stone age. And you won't be able to play your games that way, but if you've already downloaded them, you can always play in offline mode on your laptop batteries until they run out. Or if you have a generator. You can be playing Civ6 (assuming you were able to shield your laptop or computer) as you slowly starve to death.
I got 3700 hours on civ 5.(i still play it). I only have 54 hours in civ 6. Not playing that game now. never played into modern eras even. bad ai in combat and they build so few cities so its not fun. for me civ 6 is just a building game now with not mutch combat. so i will wait for maybee an expansion or better patches
I got 3700 hours on civ 5.(i still play it). I only have 54 hours in civ 6. Not playing that game now. never played into modern eras even. bad ai in combat and they build so few cities so its not fun. for me civ 6 is just a building game now with not mutch combat. so i will wait for maybee an expansion or better patches
Steam says 318 hours for me. But i hate the fact that i couldn't possibly say how much of that is play time. It's not rare that i start playing, something happens, i need to leave but i don't want to exit the game because i kinda want to continue playing, life happens and i'm 5 hours later back at my computer just to exit the game. There you go, 5 hours of playing civ if you ask steam statistics.
Let's see. There are 229 days since Civ6 was released to today. So to reach 2000 hours already, you would need to play 2000/229 = 8.7 hours per day.
Yes you have a problem
I have a modest 500 hours so far.
You wouldn't be complaining about the AI if you were playing deity early game. Consider that there's deity games where the best of this forum have to restart several times to not lose in the first 100 turns.
You wouldn't be complaining about the AI if you were playing deity early game. Consider that there's deity games where the best of this forum have to restart several times to not lose in the first 100 turns.
Well i always play on diety. But i play on Bigger map than the original map size in game. Have you tried that? It does not work as good as civ v does with the same map size
Well i always play on diety. But i play on Bigger map than the original map size in game. Have you tried that? It does not work as good as civ v does with the same map size
I've played on bigger map sizes than the normal game offers a few times. I don't see how that matters? Only way it would be different would be if you wouldn't add more civs, giving you more space in the early game. That would most certainly make the game easier as an early DoW is less likely.
I've played on bigger map sizes than the normal game offers a few times. I don't see how that matters? Only way it would be different would be if you wouldn't add more civs, giving you more space in the early game. That would most certainly make the game easier as an early DoW is less likely.
Okey. it's longer distance for the units to move on bigger maps and they are not good at that as i can see. Pluss the civs dont build enough cities to fill up the map. In civ 5 they filled up even the giant map and could send units all over the map
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
